The Chronology entries for this matter reveal a deliberate and systematic pattern of deceit designed to manipulate the legal system. The foundation of the fraud is established by the ASB Officer's false assertion of a "power of arrest" on a date before any civil process was legally in effect. This initial act of fraud is then compounded by the submission of falsified and misleading information into sworn legal statements, such as Statement of Truth for Finding of Fact in G01NR161 on 18/02/2021, regarding events surrounding the 17/07/2018 incident, the malicious "paedophile" allegation from the 14/01/2021 email and the ommissions in police logs (Chronology: 13/08/2018). The timeline consistently shows that these fabrications were used to instigate unjust legal actions, including the 27/09/2020 arrest and subsequent civil proceedings. Furthermore, the alleged use of an alias ("Tom Crabb") to fraudulently collect rent demonstrates a continued pattern of criminal conduct that extends beyond the initial civil process. Collectively, these entries illustrate a continuous and orchestrated effort to use deceit to secure an unjust outcome.
13/08/2018 – Criminal damage entry retrospectively misdated and linked to 17/07/2018 assault (Evidence of record substitution / overwriting of assault with “criminal damage”).
22/09/2020 – False “hearing allegation” letter asserting a power of arrest that did not exist (Seed misrepresentation relied on by police 27/09/2020).
04/11/2020 – Service of civil documents containing explicit false claim of prior hearing (16/09/2020) (Confirms deliberate falsehood post-issuance).
EEAS Disclosure (01/07/2025) – Confirms police attendance at 17/07/2018 assault not recorded in police systems (Independent third-party validation of falsified police record)
| Head of Claim / Prospect | Legal Elements | Core Facts / Allegations |
|---|---|---|
| Civil Process Fraud / Fraudulent Misrepresentation Strong |
Improper use of process; false material; prejudice | False prior-hearing claim; fraudulent statutory declaration denying Legal Aid; submitting falsified documents to court |
Key Chronology Entries:
|
Key Relevant Evidence:
|
Key Supporting Appendices:Notes
|
This claim is supported by a series of actions where public officers allegedly acted with malice or reckless indifference to the Victim's rights. The ASB Officer's campaign begins with the unfounded "stalking" allegation in 2017 and escalates to the malicious "paedophile" allegation in 2021. The Chronology shows that police officers were made aware of these malicious falsehoods but failed to act. For example, PC Sampher and T/Sgt Benton dismissed the Victim's legitimate complaints as "mental health issues" and knowingly participated in a flawed legal process. The police's subsequent arrest and transport of the Victim to prison for civil contempt, despite their knowledge of the procedural flaws, serves as a clear act of knowing participation in an unjust process. The documents collectively demonstrate that public officers abused their positions to inflict harm rather than uphold their duty.
20/10/2017 – Police inaction following throat-grab assault (Crime 37/68425/17)(Early failure to protect; context for later narrative inversion).
25/10/2018 – ASB Officer narrative control correspondence minimising assault as “neighbour dispute” (Abuse of position to reframe facts).
12/08/2020 – PC 1654 Feeney asserts rear garden is public, refuses to view lawful prescription (Ultra vires conduct + reckless disregard).
18/11/2022 – Arrest and imprisonment for civil contempt while injunction defects known (Knowing participation in unlawful detention)
| Head of Claim / Prospect | Legal Elements | Core Facts / Allegations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misfeasance in Public Office Strong |
Public officer; unlawful act; knowledge/recklessness; harm | ASB Officer fabricated authority to police and in court; knowing participation in unjust legal process; false claims to police |
Key Chronology Entries:
|
Key Relevant Evidence:
|
Key Supporting Appendices:Notes
|
The Chronology provides a clear and undeniable chain of events demonstrating the improper sharing of private information. The Victim's explicit request for privacy following the 28/07/2022 arrest was ignored. Instead, T/Sgt Benton disclosed confidential arrest details to the ASB Officer, who then relayed them to his colleague, Nick Bunn. This is explicitly confirmed in Nick Bunn’s sworn statement. Furthermore, NHS practitioner Vicky Catchpole sent multiple emails to Nick Bunn containing sensitive mental health information. These entries collectively prove that multiple public authorities breached confidentiality and that the improperly obtained data was used as a weapon against the Victim in civil proceedings, demonstrating a direct misuse of private information.
2020 December – Mental Health services interview ASB Officer first following Victim’s MH referral (Improper third-party disclosure / role reversal).
29/07/2022 – NSFT disclosure of mental health information to landlord staff (Confirmed NHS data breach).
01/08/2022 – T/Sgt 1845 Benton disclosure of arrest data to landlord (Police data breach acknowledged in statement).
04/08/2022 – Follow-up NHS disclosure (Vicky Catchpole) (Repeated breach; no containment)
| Head of Claim / Prospect | Legal Elements | Core Facts / Allegations |
|---|---|---|
| Data Protection / Misuse of Private Information / Confidence Strong |
Improper use of process; false material; prejudice | Unauthorised disclosure of custody/health data (e.g., disclosures to landlord; L&D pathways); onward use in statements. |
Key Chronology Entries:
|
Key Relevant Evidence:
|
Key Supporting Appendices: |
This claim is supported by a continuous pattern of false and damaging allegations. The Chronology begins with the ASB Officer's unfounded "stalking" accusation in 2017 and escalates to the malicious "paedophile" allegation in 2021. This is further proven false by a compensation order showing the Victim was the one assaulted. A separate incident involving a house guest, which the ASB Officer tried to frame as a sexual assault by the Victim, is proven false by a compensation order showing the Victim was the one assaulted. Finally, a letter from Clarion Housing Group rejecting a housing application due to a malicious reference from the landlord directly links the defamatory narrative to a tangible harm, proving the falsehoods caused significant reputational damage.
17/07/2018 – Public “paedophile” shout from vehicle, not recorded as crime (Origin of defamatory rumour).
14/01/2021 – ASB Officer email alleging “paedophile-type behaviour” (Malice; allegation disproven next day).
15/01/2021 – Police confirmation Victim not under PPU, no action taken against ASB Officer (Persistence after falsification).
Post-2021 – Continued institutional reliance on same allegation in civil / MH contexts (Ongoing publication by reliance)
| Head of Claim / Prospect | Legal Elements | Core Facts / Allegations |
|---|---|---|
| Defamation / Malicious Falsehood Strong |
Publication; falsity; serious harm; malice | ASB Officer's 14/01/2021 false email to police alleging paedophile-type behaviour; also the 30/08/2018 letter and malicious rumors; all disproven |
Key Chronology Entries:
|
Key Relevant Evidence:
|
Key Supporting Appendices:Notes
|
The Chronology entries for this claim show a systemic failure of due diligence by public authorities. The police consistently failed to investigate your valid complaints of assault and criminal damage, instead dismissing them as "issues between neighbours." They also arrested you for cannabis possession despite being aware of your legal prescription. The most egregious act of negligence is the police and NHS's dismissal of your genuine concerns about the ASB Officer as "mental health issues," which led directly to your unwarranted detention. The police's failure to act on a complaint you made to an inspector about the ASB Officer's misconduct demonstrates a disregard for their duty to protect you from harassment, which ultimately facilitated your unlawful incarceration.
27/09/2020 – Arrest without verification of claimed power of arrest (Failure of basic due diligence).
06/11/2020 – Continuance hearing acknowledges need for prescription confirmation (Court identifies issue police already acted on improperly).
2021–2022 – Repeated arrests despite known dismissal of harassment case (Negligence escalates into recklessness)Repeated arrests despite known dismissal of harassment case (Negligence escalates into recklessness).
| Head of Claim / Prospect | Legal Elements | Core Facts / Allegations |
|---|---|---|
| Negligence / Breach of Duty Moderate |
Duty; breach; foreseeability; causation | Police dismissed valid complaints; failed to investigate; pathologised complainant; disregard for prescribed medication status |
Key Chronology Entries:
|
Key Relevant Evidence:
|
Key Supporting Appendices:Notes
|
The Chronology entries collectively demonstrate a series of severe human rights violations. The unlawful arrest on 27/09/2020 and the subsequent denial of legal aid following a fraudulent declaration violated the right to liberty (Art 5) and a fair trial (Art 6). The unconsented "Professionals Meeting," the MHA sectioning, and the improper disclosure of private medical information directly breached a right to a private life (Art 8). The culmination of these actions, leading to a sentence of imprisonment "in absence" while subject to 72hr "Hold" in a medical facility, is the most profound violation. These events were not isolated but a continuous and systemic assault on your fundamental rights, leading to unjust incarceration.
Late service of civil documents denying effective participation (Article 6 – fair hearing).
Mental health detention intersecting with civil committal (Article 5 – unlawful deprivation of liberty). Circulation of MH narratives to justify civil enforcement (Article 8 – private life interference)
| Head of Claim / Prospect | Legal Elements | Core Facts / Allegations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human Rights Act 1998 (Art 5,8,6) Moderate–Strong |
Public authority; interference; not justified | Unlawful arrest/detention; unlawful deprivation of liberty (MHA detention and incarceration); privacy breaches; unfair proceedings |
Key Chronology Entries:
|
Key Relevant Evidence:
|
Key Supporting Appendices:Notes
|
This claim is supported by the cumulative impact of the prolonged and malicious misconduct. The Chronology shows that the initial malicious attacks in 2017 and 2018 were not isolated but a sustained campaign of harassment. The unjust incarceration for seven and a half months, during which the Victim lost almost all possessions, is a direct, severe, and measurable harm. A letter from Clarion Housing Group rejecting a housing application due to a malicious reference from the Flagship Housing Group directly links the defamatory narrative to a tangible, long-term consequence of homelessness. These entries, combined with the continuous dismissal of valid complaints, paint a picture of deliberate and egregious harm that warrants aggravated and exemplary damages.
2017–2025 – Duration of misconduct without correction (Sustained harm).
Post-dismissal reliance (2021 onward) – Continued use of disproven allegations (Oppressive, arbitrary conduct).
EEAS + PSD 2025 – Institutions still relying on falsified 2018 record (Entrenchment after exposure)
| Head of Claim / Prospect | Legal Elements | Core Facts / Allegations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aggravated / Exemplary Damages Strong |
Primary tort; aggravating conduct; serious harm | Sustained harassment; reputational damage; PTSD aggravation; unlawful incarceration (7.5 months) |
This claim serves as the "unravelling" point for the entire case, as it establishes that the initial injunction and subsequent committal were obtained through fundamental fraud. The Chronology entries prove a clear, chronological pattern of deceit. The ASB Officer's false claims about a legal hearing, combined with the submission of fraudulent police records that are proven false by a DVLA SORN, demonstrate a concerted effort to deceive the court. The allegations of "paedophile" behaviour, which were explicitly debunked by police, further illustrate the malicious intent behind the fraud. This continuous and documented pattern of misrepresentation, from the very beginning of the legal process, invalidates all subsequent judgments and is the central argument for setting aside the committal order.
13/08/2018 – Seed falsification of police record. 27/09/2020 – Fraudulent arrest predicated on false civil authority.
2021–2022 – Clinical contamination and reuse. 2023–2025 – Independent validation + continued reliance (These entries together establish continuing fraud, not historical error.)
| Head of Claim / Prospect | Legal Elements | Core Facts / Allegations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Underlying Civil Fraud Strong |
False representation; knowledge of falsity/recklessness; intent to cause reliance; reliance; resulting loss | Knowingly false statements in civil process (e.g., fabricated prior hearing 16/09/2020; false statutory declarations, HRA Declared "No") to obtain injunctions/orders; concealment of contrary evidence; used to secure advantage and cause loss. Concluded torious act. |
Key Chronology Entries:
|
Key Relevant Evidence:
|
Key Supporting Appendices: |