Tier One

Set Aside Judgment (13 Oct 2022)

Status: Accurate as at October 2025; Chronology remains authoritative thereafter

Cross-referenced to Chronology, Claims Matrix, Evidence Matrix, NHS/GP Records, and Legislation Reference (2005).

Primary Goal

Set aside 13 Oct 2022 committal on the ground of fraud on the court and associated due-process violations.

Authority

Court’s inherent jurisdiction; CPR 39.3 / 52.11 (re-opening/setting aside where deception taints process).

Entry Point

Concluded Tortious Act

Inflation–Deflation Loop (Police/Civil Domain)

Police

Arrest ~ Custody Record

Police Matter Dismissed

→

Civil

N16A Injunction Application

N205c Notice of Issue

Mandatory Notice

→

Concluded Tort

Settlement (HNK)

Particulars of Claim (HNK)

I. Central Arc — Fraud on the Court

Civil Misclassification (Oct 2020)

N16A declares “No HRA issues”; injunction pursues silence while criminal case live.

Fraud Continuum

Jurisdictional Defect

→

Contaminated Data Bridge (Jan 2021)

ASB ↔ Police email thread seeds false risk narrative; unlawful status disclosure.

Clinical Continuity 2000 - 2025

Evidence Matrix

→

Downstream Orders (2021–2022)

Affidavits rely on tainted material leading to committal (13 Oct 2022).

SoT Analysis 1 & 2

Committal Analysis

Nick Bunn Statement

Relief

Set aside committal and any orders procured by deception.
Directions for disclosure (ASB/Police/NHS inter-agency communications).
Stay of enforcement pending re-hearing on proper footing.

II-A. Misfeasance in Public Office

Police reliance on known false material and retaliatory correspondence post-acquittal.

Key Refs

Chronology (5 Jan 2021) ⮭ · Appendix B · Email Thread

Legal

Misfeasance tort; HRA Arts 5 & 6 (Detention & Fair Trial).

II-B. Institutional Contamination

NHS/GP adopting ASB narrative as clinical risk; data propagated unlawfully into care decisions.

Key Refs

Hospital Records · GP Records · NHS Healthcare

Legal

DPA 2018 s.170; UK GDPR Arts 5–6; MHA 1983 ss.2 & 136.

II-C. Representation Denial

Legal Aid refusal contradicting Court direction; collapse of representation before committal.

Key Refs

Order 19 Aug 2022 ⮭ · Appendix R · Legal Breaches

Legal

HRA Art 6; LASPO (eligibility/entitlement context).

III. Procedural Chain (Context)

27 Sep 2020

Arrest; devices seized (criminal process begins).

→

09 Oct 2020

N16A Injunction (civil route engaged).

→

05 Jan 2021

Criminal charge dismissed; civil order continues.

→

22 Apr 2021

Professionals’ meeting (risk narrative).

→

May–Jun 2021

S.136 detention / release.

→

19 Aug 2022

Order re: representation (Legal Aid available).

→

13 Oct 2022

Committal to prison (target judgment).

Full detail in Chronology ⮭; cross-references resolved via in-page anchors.

IV. Legislation Keys

Statute-section alignment for submissions and skeleton arguments (see Legislation Reference (2005)).

Perjury Act 1911 s.1 — knowingly false statements to court.
HRA 1998 Arts 5, 6, 8 — detention, fair trial, private life.
Data Protection Act 2018 s.170 — unlawful obtaining/disclosure.
MHA 1983 ss.2, 136 — admission and police custody safeguards.

V. Sequence for Counsel

Issue application to set aside committal (fraud on the court).
Seek directions for disclosure (ASB/Police/NHS comms & audit trails).
Apply stay of enforcement pending re-hearing.
Prepare secondary claims (Misfeasance / HRA) once jurisdiction restored.
Align any regulator outcomes to evidential bundle (PSD/IOPC/PHSO/LeO).

VI. Outcome Paths

Immediate

Nullity of 13 Oct 2022 order; records corrected.
Disclosure revealing perjury/data misuse nexus.

Subsequent

Damages via Misfeasance / HRA claims.
Institutional remediation prompted by oversight alignment.