Claims Matrix — Reconciled Full (C‑01–C‑19)

Context: Unified Civil and Criminal Causation Chain (2017–2025). Exact (matches wording in Legislation Reference (2005).odt), 🟡Partial (to be verified/expanded).

ID Head of Claim Defendant(s) / Entity Core Facts & Probative Evidence (from your bundle) Legal Basis (Reconciled) Status / Forum
C‑01 Civil Process Fraud / Fraudulent Misrepresentation P. Sharples; Flagship HG False hearing/date assertions (16/09/2020) disproved by N205c (14/10/2020); false statutory declaration used to found injunction; paper-only processes leveraged.
Fraud Act 2006 s.1 (general offence of fraud).
Fraud Act 2006 s.2 (fraud by false representation).
🟡Perjury Act 1911 s.5 (false statements in statutory declarations) — if a statutory declaration was used.
🟡CPR r.32.14 (false statements verified by statement of truth).
Set‑aside prep



Claim Head
C‑02 Abuse of Process Flagship HG; P. Sharples Procedural manipulation incl. paper‑only hearing (19/02/2021), misleading bundle inclusions, jurisdictional defects.
🟡Court’s inherent jurisdiction to prevent abuse; strike‑out under CPR 3.4.
🟡Contempt of Court Act 1981 (where conduct tends to interfere with justice).
For pleadings



Claim Head
C‑03 Perjury / Contempt of Court P. Sharples False statements verified by Statement of Truth; misrepresented police logs and timelines.
Perjury Act 1911 s.1 (perjury).
🟡Contempt of Court Act 1981 (residual contempt not captured by perjury).
Referral option



Claim Head
C‑04 False Arrest & False Imprisonment (27/09/2020) Suffolk Constabulary; P. Sharples (instigator) Arrest predicated on non‑existent power of arrest; charge later dismissed (05/01/2021); custody chain irregularities.
🟡Common law (false imprisonment).
🟡ECHR Art. 5 (right to liberty) via HRA 1998.
🟡PACE 1984 (Code G necessity; lawfulness of arrest) — verify precise code refs.
Live (IOPC/PSD)



Claim Head
C‑05 Malicious Prosecution Flagship HG; P. Sharples Injunction/committals advanced on falsified/omissive evidence; improper motive; termination in claimant’s favour on strands.
🟡Common law tort (malicious prosecution) — elements: prosecution, lack of reasonable and probable cause, malice, damage.
🟡HRA 1998 Art. 6 (fair trial) where relevant.
For pleadings



Claim Head
C‑06 Misfeasance in Public Office T/Sgt Benton; PC Sampher; PC Feeney (and/or others) Knowing reliance on false reports; biased record‑keeping; enabling defective process; wrongful disclosures.
🟡Common law tort (misfeasance in public office: targeted malice or knowledge/reckless indifference to illegality and harm).
Under IOPC



Claim Head
C‑07 Trespass to Person (Assault/Battery) Police officers involved Physical interference during arrest/transport connected to unlawful arrest chain.
🟡Common law (assault/battery; absence of lawful justification).
Linked to C‑04



Claim Head
C‑08 Harassment (Course of Conduct) P. Sharples; Flagship HG Continuing intimidation (letters, emails, threats, engineered complaints) forming a course of conduct.
🟡Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (civil and criminal).
Actionable



Claim Head
C‑09 Defamation / Malicious Falsehood P. Sharples; Flagship HG (and/or others) Publication of false allegations (e.g., Jan 2021 email re: “paedophile behaviour” attribution) causing serious harm.
🟡Defamation Act 2013 (serious harm threshold; defences).
🟡Malicious falsehood (common law/Economic Torts).
For counsel review



Claim Head
C‑10 Data Protection / Misuse of Private Information / Confidence Suffolk Police; NSFT; Flagship HG; named officers Unauthorised disclosure of custody/health data (e.g., disclosures to landlord; L&D pathways); onward use in statements.
🟡UK GDPR (Arts. 5, 6) & Data Protection Act 2018 (e.g., s.170 offences; Part 3 for law enforcement processing).
🟡Misuse of private information (common law), Breach of Confidence.
For pleadings



Claim Head
C‑11 Professional Negligence Prior solicitors / advisors (as applicable) Advice/actions falling below standard; reliance on tainted medical reports; abandonment of ATE; causative loss.
🟡Common law negligence (duty, breach, causation, loss); SRA Standards (contextual, not cause of action).
LeO complaint on foot



Claim Head
C‑12 Unlawful Detention (Mental Health Act) NSFT; Dr. C. Zapata; involved practitioners 28‑day sectioning predicated on speculative information; later findings of no underlying illness.
🟡Mental Health Act 1983 (admission criteria; s.2/s.3 etc. — verify exact ground).
🟡HRA 1998 Art. 5/8 (liberty/private life).
PHSO Seized of Matter



Claim Head
C‑13 Discrimination As applicable (police/NHS/landlord) Adverse treatment leveraging rumours re: sexual orientation; differential handling of complaints.
🟡Equality Act 2010 (protected characteristics; harassment; victimisation) — verify pleaded ground(s).
🟡HRA 1998 Art. 14 (non‑discrimination) with Art. 8/5 as anchors.
For pleadings



Claim Head
C‑14 Human Rights Act Breaches Public authorities as applicable Interference with liberty, private life, and fair trial rights across the process chain.
🟡HRA 1998 (Arts. 5, 6, 8; and 14 where relevant).
For pleadings



Claim Head
C‑15 Conspiracy (Unlawful Means) Primary actor(s) + collaborators Coordinated acts (false reports, improper disclosures) to injure the claimant by unlawful means.
🟡Common law (tort of conspiracy by unlawful means).
For counsel review



Claim Head
C‑16 Vicarious Liability Flagship HG; Suffolk Police; NSFT (as employers) Liability of employers for torts of employees acting in course of employment.
🟡Common law (vicarious liability principles; close connection test).
Derivative



Claim Head
C‑17 Negligent Supervision / Management Employers / Supervisors Failure to supervise employees who engaged in unlawful conduct leading to claimant’s loss.
🟡Common law negligence (systems and supervision duties).
Derivative



Claim Head
C‑18 Trespass to Goods / Conversion As applicable Loss/interference with possessions (e.g., memory stick disappearance; handling of goods).
🟡Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977; common law conversion.
For pleadings



Claim Head
C‑19 Psychiatric / Aggravated / Exemplary Damages Aggravating features (dishonesty, oppression, constitutional rights infringed) and psychiatric injury flowing from chain.
🟡Damages principles (exemplary per Rookes v Barnard categories; aggravated where humiliation/distress aggravated by conduct).
Quantum



Claim Head