Chronology Search Hub

Case sensitive Regular Expression All matches

⭾ Bi-domain Crossover · ◈ Tri-domain Crossover · ⬬ Distortion Point · ◆ Pivot · ⤤ Recycled

27/05/1971: Misuse of Drugs Act This stupidity caused many more problems than it solved...
- Probative: A boyhood memory.pdf
- Probative: history-you-know.pdf
- Probative: prescription-pdf-MyzZ46jRm9.pdf
1980: HISTORICAL - Ongoing Victim Medical Background The Victim has a long history of treatment for childhood injuries, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and anxiety, with records held in NHS Core Systems. However, these foundational records were subsequently obscured, an act believed to be a direct consequence of Dr. C. Zapata's later interventions. Whether this obfuscation was deliberate is a critical question for the Parliamentary Health Services Ombudsman (PHSO) to determine through their investigation (PHSO Case Reference: C-2154042).
01/10/2000: Victim Assaulted While Operating as Private Hire The Victim was assaulted while working as a Private Hire Taxi driver. Subsequently diagnosed with PTSD and anxiety, they fully engaged with Mental Health services and were successfully discharged from psychiatric care on 27/03/2007.
- Probative: Private Hire Documents.pdf
- Probative: 01-10-2000 Assault RTA.pdf
2004
17/07/2004: Victim publishes first novel Mindscape Victim had set up a temporary website for the promotion of the novel.
- Public: Published Novel
- Probative: Mindscape - MJ Deakin.pdf
- Note: The victim's Facebook account profile mpeafree records the evolution of the public domain with contemporaneous detail across multiple years.
29/09/2004: Local Publication and Public Identification On or about this date, the Victim was publicly identified within his immediate residential area as the author of a published novel, following local newspaper coverage and contemporaneous photographs. This event establishes an early, verifiable temporal marker for the Victim’s public identity within the local community, which later became relevant to subsequent narrative framing, credibility assessments, and institutional responses during later disputes.
- Public: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Mindscape-M-J-Deakin/dp/141371465X
- Probative: 29-09-2004-local-news.pdf
- Probative: Mindscape-rear-cover.pdf
- Probative: 16-09-2003-original-rear-cover-photo.pdf Burgess Hill Author Outside/Beside Waitrose
- Probative: author-at-home-photo.pdf
15/12/2004: Personal Website – Initial Self-Hosting Facing not inconsiderable costs of hosting services the Victim’s first personal websitewas created as an experimental project. Self-hosted using an Apache Server variant maintained by Aprelium Abyss. The archived folder captures the site structure and associated assets as they existed at or about that time and is retained as background material evidencing contemporaneous online publishing activity.
- Probative: MPEAFREE 📂 (Shell View)
- Public: Aprelium (Apache Server) Forum Index
- Probative: Server Host Manifest 21/02/2005
2005
19/05/2005: ⬬ High-Gravity Safeguarding Record (Latent Contextual Event) On this date, a court-authorised search warrant was issued in connection with a safeguarding investigation involving the Victim’s then future spouse, introducing a high-gravity safeguarding context into the Victim’s relational and administrative history. While temporally discrete, the existence of this record establishes a latent contextual factor that later became capable of influencing institutional risk perception, narrative framing, and credibility assessments in subsequent interactions.
- Probative: 19-05-2005-warrant.pdf
04/11/2005: ✱ ⬬ Neighbour Allegation Escalated to Housing Association; Victim Seeks Legal Advice The Victim contacted a solicitor to seek preliminary legal advice regarding an alleged tenancy breach following 'anonymous' neighbour complaints to the housing association about the keeping of birds, expressing a desire to resolve the matter without escalation and indicating willingness to compromise. From the Victim’s perspective, this constitutes the earliest documented instance in which a Problem–Reaction–Solution pattern was recognised in real time, informed by prior lived experience; however, the precise initiating point of the mechanism remains under review pending further documentary corroboration.
- Probative: solicitor-first.txt
- Note: The victim's Ex-Wife was then one of those neighbours. Contemporaneous material relevant to this event exists within a subdirectory of the Victim’s preserved digital archive. A directory manifest identifying the location and scope of that material within the victim's 'cold store' archive has been generated and is found in /build-logs/ as "manifest_My Cabinet_1767701000233.json"
2006
07/07/2006: CICAP Notice of Hearing Date This matter relates to the incident 01/10/2000 Case Reference: L/2/255737-PANA
- Probative: 07-07-2006-CICAP-communication-re2000-assault.pdf
2007
27/03/2007: Robert Moore of Summerfold Community Mental Health Centre discharges the Victim from Mental Health treatment after long recovery from events detail in 01/10/2000.
Documents Chronology
evidence Robert Moore Psychiatric Assessment 23-01-2007.pdf
Chronology: 01/10/2000
2009
January 2009: Relocation Mid Sussex to West Suffolk The Victim relocated from Mid-Sussex with their wife and 6-week-old baby boy to Honington, Suffolk.

Documents	Chronology
evidence Robert Moore Psychiatric Assessment 23-01-2007.pdf	Chronology: 01/10/2000

20/03/2009: ✱ ⬬ ◈ Marital Breakdown Following the stress of relocation and a deteriorating marriage marked with both mental and physical abuse, the Victim moved out, experiencing a period of homelessness before securing new rented accommodation in Newmarket, West Suffolk, by 14/04/2009. Legal counsel was engaged for family matters, during which the Victim's then-wife began a pattern of calculated deceit and narrative manipulation. (Counsel email chains auditable)

Documents	Chronology Entries
Probative: blunt-object-injury.pdf Probative: behavioural-patterns-analysis.pdf Probative: Cross-Agency PRS.pdf Probative: Family Civil Process 📂 (Shell View - Analysis Document Baseline Material) Appendix F: Marital History Appendix U: Background Summary (Familiy Civil Document-Based)	Chronology: 04/11/2005: Marital Breakup Recriminations Note: This period beginning in March 2009 through to mid April 2014 was marked with multiple false allegations involving five arrests none of which resulted in charge or warning and were unequivocally rebutted in Family Civil Process with supporting material at the time.

10/12/2009 Victim's former GP Dr S. Gankerseer of The Meadows Surgery, Temple Grove, Burgess Hill in West Sussex, was requested to provide background medical details for Family Court proceedings. The Victim at this time resided in Newmarket, West Suffolk, a rented room in a House of Multiple Occupancy (HMO) while registered with Home-Link as not suitably housed.
- Probative: Dr Gankerseer Reports.pdf
30/10/2010 Victim begins to suffer increased health problems with pre existing conditions exacerbated by living conditions, a badly fitting sash window allowing dust and other fine particulates in through the gaps. The Victim's ground floor rented room looked directly out onto a Newmarket Horse Walk (concrete bridleway), these bridleways were rarely cleaned of manure if at all (hot sunny day, windy, dusty)
- Probative: 17/03/2014 Dr Webb.pdf
- Probative: 30/07/2010 Sleep Apnoea Care Papworth 30-07-2010.pdf
2012

02/08/2012: ⬬ Malicious Website Referrals and Domain Disruption During the period of 2009 to 2014, the Victim's website experienced numerous service interruptions due to repeated malicious false referrals made to the free hosting and domain registrar (ex-wife suspected, though not definitively confirmed). This compelled the Victim to repeatedly defend his website's content. In early 2014, the Victim sought a more permanent solution to this persistent harassment, transitioning to paid hosting and full domain registration. This strategic move made the ex-wife's recriminatory attempts to take down his website significantly more difficult, as reports were then more rigorously investigated and debunked by administrators before reaching the suspension stage.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Doctors letters 2012 - 2017.pdf Probative: Wayback Machine Screenshot 02-08-2012 Archived Probative: www.parrotwisdom.co.uk Archived	Chronology: 29/09/2004 First Publications - Self Hosted/Public Domain

14/05/2012: NHS Correspondance
- Probative: Doctors letters 2012 - 2017.pdf
2014
2014: Approved CCTV & Security The Victim's home security CCTV system was installed. This proactive measure, reviewed and approved by the landlord's Area Manager at tenancy commencement, served as an early, crucial step in documenting events and providing a verifiable record. It was also approved on crime prevention grounds for public areas. It soon proves useful to police searching for an individual known to be armed with a knife and home made explosive device.
- Probative: Police Searching Public Access.mp4
- Probative: Officer Arriving to Review Footage.pdf
2015
05/06/2015: Suffolk Constabulary - Victim Requests Clarification
- Probative: 05-06-2015-clarification-request-to-suffolk-constabulary.pdf
26/11/2015: ⬬ GP Telephone triage A mental-health triage note was completed and the victim was advised to self-refer for counselling/support and discharged back to GP; it also recorded stress about an impending PIP assessment and stated the victim was “living alone after divorcing from wife six years ago”. That divorce timing is inaccurate against the 2012 divorce papers, indicating an internal inconsistency in the record.
- Probative: 26/11/2015 Dr Hutton MH Triage.pdf
07/12/2015: Second attempt to engage with services via a telephone wellbeing assessment. The victim stated at the time an issue was completing disability-benefit paperwork along with unsuitable housing given his MH and physical needs; Instead of referral to appropriate mental health (re long standing MH issues raised on the telephone) the victim was signposted to Citizens Advice and then discharged, with the option to re-refer when ready.
- Probative: 07/12/2015 Wellbeing Assessment Session 07-12-2015.pdf
14/12/2015: GP “To Whom It May Concern” letter supporting disability benefits/allowances, confirming the victim’s long-term conditions (including chronic back pain affecting mobility and mixed anxiety/depression) and that day-to-day functioning and self-organisation deteriorated following separation. The letter records a Social Services referral had been made and asks this information be considered when deciding entitlement.
- Probative: Dr B Qureshi Letter-14-12-2015.pdf
18/08/2015: ⬬ First Engagement as witness for Flagship Housing Victime provided a statement for counsel representing F;aghsip Housing Group Ltd in a matter of ASB regarding another tenant.
- Probative: incident-08-08-2015-involving-Mr-Wilson.pdf
- Probative: 106253 - Witness Statement of Michael Burdette-Deakin.pdf
- Note: This ASB eviction case was handled by Flagship Housing Group Ltd. ASB matters are necessarily managed by the ASB Officer. P. Sharples held this role during the relevant period. His sworn Statement of Truth (18/02/2021 Finding of Fact hearing) denying any prior dealings with Victim raises questions given Victim's involvement as witness in Flagship ASB case under Sharples' purview in 2015.
2016
21/09/2016: Three Successive Non Fault RTA The Victim was involved in the third of three severe road traffic accidents within five weeks (the first minor on 17/08/2016, the second scary but minor on the morning of 21/09/2016, and the third late on 21/09/2016 resulting in vehicle total loss). These accidents exacerbated pre-existing childhood lumbar injuries and severe PTSD/anxiety, leading to heavy medication and largely housebound status.
- Probative: NJ55 KXK Last Seen.pdf
- Note: This was the second RTA of the day and the third in four weeks, victim had been returning from a visit with his parents in Sussex.
01/12/2016: Burglary Attempt 19 Holmsey Green After request from 19 Holmsey Green for CCTV footage regarding a recent attempted break in Victim upgraded Infra-Red floodlight on the CCTV camera covering public access running between the rear of Holmsey green and the rear of 22 to 25 Shrub House Close.
- Probative: New IR Flood Cam 01 Public Access.mp4
- Probative: Shrub House Close.pdf
- Probative: Victims CCTV Coverage Day.pdf
- Probative: Victims CCTV Coverage Night.pdf
- Probative: Bespoke CCTV and Security Illumination.pdf
- Note PIR sensors for security lighting were also upgraded at this time.
2017
08/08/2017: New Adoption The Victim adopted a 7-month-old, jet-black rescue cat to join his companion parrot. The cat was kept as a housecat for familiarization, neutering, and microchipping until fully settled.

Probative: jinx-neutered.pdf

August 2017: RTA Compensation The Victim received significant compensation for the 21/09/2016 accidents.
10/08/2017: ⬬ Becki Gaunt The Victim received an email from the Landlord Area Manager responding to the victims online report regarding an incident with a Flagship employee.
- Probative: 10-08-2017-becki-gaunt-re-employee-concerns.pdf
- Note: CCTV was approved by then Area Manager Ann Dixon within months of taking up the tenancy, Dixon was promoted to Regional Manager. One can presume the CCTV 'issues' indicated by Becki Gaunt were subsequently confirmed by Ann Dixon alongside review of the victims tenancy file for approval documentation as no further mention of the CCTV appears in any communications from Beck Gaunt thereafter...

12/08/2017: Early August Dream Car The Victim used compensation to part-purchase a Mercedes Benz Convertible Roadster, funding the remainder with finance.
See

Documents	Chronology Entries
Probative: Somewhat Unique.pdf Probative: Why a Parrot.pdf Co-Regulation System - Companion Parrot Probative: tree-bound-for-nine-hours.pdf Appendix K	Chronology: 21/09/2016

Note: Victim and support companion became a unique sight in the town of Mildenhall, regularly seen enjoying a coffee outside Costa Coffee.

24/08/2017: Becki Gaunt The Victim received an email from the Landlord Area Manager regarding other issues. Quote: "Thank you for your email as below, I apologise for the delay in responding. It seems like you are well respected in the community and that those who live near you trust and feel comfortable..."

Documents	Chronology Entries
Probative: 24-08-2017-becki-gaunt-re-other-concerns.pdf Appendix E.2	Chronology: 01/12/2016

Note This positive assessment from a senior landlord staff member directly contrasts with the ASB Officer's later portrayal of the Victim,which forms part of the context for Crime Report 37/57105/20 (Victim's counter-allegation against the ASB Officer regarding the 27/09/2020 incident).

15/09/2017: Mid-September First Signs of Trouble A new female renter at 25 Shrub House Close, referred to as "Crystal-25" (a sex worker with subsequent apparent substance and alcohol misuse problems), moved into an empty property at the opposite end of the four-bungalow terrace.
17/09/2017: Late September (one week after first lift): Crystal-25 again requested a lift for a fee late on a Friday evening. The Victim, now aware of her business, declined due to concerns about compromising disability and social security incomes with immoral earnings.

23/09/2017: ✱ Upload to Youtube The Victim was out late evening, walking the still un-neutered cat in a glow-in-the-dark harness. They heard indistinct voices, picked up the cat, and walked back home via the public access at the rear of the terrace. Passing Crystal-25's rear gate, the Victim briefly encountered Crystal-25 and the ASB Officer. This is the compromising encounter that triggered the ASB Officer's subsequent campaign to destroy the Victim's credibility.

Documents	Chronology Entries
Probative: Jinx Luminous Locator Harness.mp4	Chronology: 18/08/2015

27/09/2017: ⭾ ⬬ Stalking Allegation from ASB Officer See 23/09/2017 previous entry. The Victim received a letter from the ASB Officer, falsely accusing the Victim of stalking Crystal-25. The Victim proactively challenged this with 24 hours of home security CCTV footage, demonstrating only a brief, late-evening cat walk, and expressed strong objection to malicious accusations and the ASB Officer's presence off-hours. Upon discovering he had been recorded on the CCTV system at Crystal-25's rear garden gate, the ASB Officer then began demanding to 'review the system'. This swift, baseless accusation and demand for CCTV access, following the Area Manager's positive assessment, suggested animosity from the ASB Officer, contributing to Victim distress.

Documents	Chronology Entries
Probative: A Paradigm Lost... Study and Research/Repair	Chronology: 23/09/2017

Note: There is no longer record of the ASB communication, after the Judgement in absence of hearing 13/10/2022 the Victims entire volume of possessions and documentation was cleared and disposed of during eviction process after 18/10/2022 while the victim was incarcerated for 7.5 Months. However, P. Sharples if Becki Gaunt emails are to be relied upon was not at that time ASB Officer, Ellen Valledy is indicated in emails from Becki Gaunt as the 'new ASB Officer'.

Matrix: C-13 C-19

20/10/2017: ⬬ First Assault by Crystal-25 The Victim was walking home from a local convenience store when Crystal-25 approached, "stormed" across the road, grabbed the Victim by the throat, and "growled." This assault left the Victim shaken and in shock, exacerbating pre-existing anxiety. Subsequent police inaction (Crime reference: 37/68425/17), advising 'no witnesses', indicated an early failure to protect the Victim.

Documents	Chronology Entries
Probative: 37-68425-17 20-10-2017-PC 1983 BENTON.pdf Probative: Crystal-25 Advert - Profile in Detail.pdf Crime: 20_10_2017_37-68425-17.pdf CAD: SC-20102017-90 (20/10/2017)	Chronology: 24/08/2017

Note: The CAD record confirms the Victim reported the assault and being "shaken," and that police were dispatched. This confirms the initial police response to the event. This incident marks the beginning of explicit direct conflictwith Crystal-25, and is subsequently wrongly linked to Crime reference: 37/46851/18 and forms part of the broader context for Crime Report 37/24415/21 (detailing Crystal-25's threatening Facebook posts.) Victim responded same day detailing Crystal-25's assault history, including 17/07/2018 ABH with paramedic/ambulance attendance. Sharples acknowledged 'history of incidents' and ongoing police investigation but proceeded with social media suppression letter anyway, prioritizing protection of Crystal-25 over documented assault victim.

25/10/2017: Becki Gaunt The Victim emails Becki Gaunt detailing the assault on 20/10/2017 and requesting contact details for Paul Quick Public ASB Officer.
- Probative: 25-10-2017-becki-gaunt-re-assault.pdf
2018

17/07/2018: ✱ ⬬ ◆ Conflicting Official Records The Victim was returning from the local store, walking back into Shrub House Close. From Victim's prior statements; "I was walking back from the store, had made my way half way into Shrub House Close when I began to hear an argument outside number 15. The argument stopped, a car door slammed, engine revved into life and the car came racing up the street in my direction leaving Shrub House Close. It stopped sharply beside me, the driver called out the window "Watch that old boy down there, he's a pedo" then sped off." This matter does not relate to Criminal damage to Victim's vehicle Mercedes-Benz SKL280 as indicated in **Statement of Truth 18/02/2021 Serious Questions** which in fact happened some months later. An unknown suspect poured red paint over the entire front of the car. This event on 17/07/2018 was not recorded in Suffolk Constabulary records and there is no crime report for this incident in spite of four (or more) officers attending the scene.This crime report is linked to Crime reference: 37/68425/17 (Crystal-25's assault and "paedophile" allegation from 17/07/2018). Linked Crime References: 37/40977/18, 37/29868/18, 37/39827/18. Multiple questions arise from this incident in both statements made by ASB Officer and the police. See East of England Ambulance Service (EEAS) Disclosure linked below for this incident.

Documents	Chronology Entries
Probative: Information Request (Clinical Records) - Incident in July 2018.pdf Probative: EEAS Patient Consent Legal Services June 2018.pdf Probative: misleading-the-court-18-02-2021.pdf Probative:EEAS Disclosure 17/07/2018 Probative: Google Earth-03-07-2018.pdf Appendix E2: ASB Comms Analysis Appendix D: Statement of Truth 18/02/2021	Chronology: 20/10/2017

13/08/2018: ⬬ ⭾ Alleged Criminal Damage to Vehicle This crime report details the alleged criminal damage to the Victim's Mercedes Benz SLK D12VJD, where red paint was purportedly poured over the front of the parked vehicle. The actual paint damage occurred in December 2018, not on this date, highlighting a misrepresentation of the timeline.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Crystal-25 Facebook post 16-12-2018.pdf Probative: Crystal-25 Facebook post 16-12-2019.pdf Crime: 13_08_2018_37-46851-18.pdf CAD: SC-13082018-247 (13/08/2018)	Chronology: 17/07/2018 Conflicting Official Records Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Campaign Origin)

Note:The CAD record for the related criminal damage report explicitly links the complaint to an assault that occurred on 17/07/2018, confirming police were aware of the assault but failed to generate a separate crime report for it.See SC-13082018-247 (13/08/2018) for related investigation summary.
With hindsight, the 2018 criminal damage entry was not contemporaneous. It was inserted to overwrite the original 17/07/2018 assault record. This is the seed of the civil fraud.

Matrix: C-01 C-06 C-08 C-09 C-10 C-11

30/08/2018: ⬬ First Documented Instance of Attempt to Suppress The ASB Officer attempted to hand a letter to the Victim during an unannounced visit, accompanied by an expected landlord housing repair visitor. The 'letter' (further detail is provided in Appendix C) concerned "alleged abusive behaviour" on social media. It explicitly stated: "I regret that I must write to you in relation to alleged abusive behaviour by you towards a near neighbour. It has been brought to my attention that 'posts' made by you on your social media site may easily be perceived as insulting and offensive towards the Victim at 25 Shrub House Close. I therefore write to you as a representative of your landlord to take this opportunity to remind you of your obligations as a Flagship Victim in terms of behaviour towards other neighbours. I have seen posts attributed to your name dated from October 2017 and more recently dated 13th August 2018. They make clear reference to a woman three doors down from you and the woman at number 25. You refer to 'the prostitute and the 'silly c**t. both of which are unacceptable and are harassing in nature and by any standard offensive and bullying. I would ask that you stop making such references to anybody in this way never mind a near neighbour either within social media or via any other medium I will consult the police with regards to whether it may possibly constitute criminal harassment and also seek advice in relation to possible tenancy action. If there is anything you don't understand or wish to discuss in this letter please contact me." The 30/08/2018 documents show a self-referential loop: ASB Officer Sharples created a letter (21st), claimed the victim did not receive it, then created a second letter (30th) to document a "refusal" to read the first one . This "paper trail of non-compliance" was then handed to the Norwich County Court in 2020 as a verified history of anti-social behavior, forming alongside the 27/09/2020 arrest the keystone of the injunction that eventually led to committal on 13/10/2022.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Landlord Employee Letter Social Media 30-08-2018.pdf Original as recieved Probative: Landlord Employee Letter Social Media 30-08-2018 From Statement of Truth 18-02-2021.pdf Laundered as discovered in SoT for FoF Probative: 30-08-2018-email-exchange-victim-sharples.pdf Appendix A Assessment of intended malice Appendix C.4 Landlord intent assessment Appendix E.2	Chronology: 08/08/2022

Note This letter, issued after two physical assaults by Crystal-25 on the Victim, appeared to control the Victim's narrative and silence expression about Crystal-25's behavior, rather than addressing documented issues. The ASB Officer was clearly indicating the sex worker, Crystal-25, as the 'Victim at 25 Shrub House Close' in his quoted communication. It exemplified bias against the Victim and misuse of authority, causing significant distress. It is pivotal evidence for the ASB Officer's actions, framing the Victim as the aggressor despite being a victim of documented assaults. A detailed analysis is provided in Appendix A. The inclusion of this internal email (printed on headed notepaper) on pages 66 and 67 of the bundle of documents submitted for the Finding of Fact hearing on 18th February 2022, seemingly as part of a sworn Statement of Fact, further compounds its legal gravity. Victim responded same day in email detailing Crystal-25's assault history, including 17/07/2018 ABH with paramedic/ambulance attendance. Sharples acknowledged 'history of incidents' and ongoing police investigation but proceeded with social media suppression letter anyway, prioritizing protection of Crystal-25 over documented assault victim

Matrix: C-06 C-08 C-09

28/09/2018: ASB Officer Sharples CCTV Unlawful Request Unless duly accredited under a Community Safety Accreditation Scheme (CSAS) or acting jointly with police under a signed protocol, a privately employed ASB Officer has no independent power of investigation or right to demand private CCTV. This unlawful request was repeated numerous times along with requests to review my private prescriptions.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: ASB Sharples CCTV Demand 28-09-2018.pdf	Chronology: 13/09/2019

Note: Making such a demand and implying compulsory compliance risks:
Ultra vires conduct (acting beyond authority).
Data-protection breach if any footage was later obtained or shared without lawful basis.
Abuse of position / Misrepresentation if presented as an official order.

30/09/2018: Cease and Desist sent to ASB Officer Victim sends cease and desist communication to ASB Officer regarding malicious allegations in both email and postal mail, communications denying by ommission the actions of Crystal-25 tenant of 25 Shrub House Close.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Victim Sends Cease and Desist.pdf	Chronology: 30/08/2018

Note: Cease and desist had been intended to indicate the previous communication from Landlord Employee and the intimidation communications long before that communication were contrary to the covenant of quiet enjoyment. Victim at the time of the incidents true beginning Late September 2017 was as noted still recovering a very serious vehicle accident and under heavy medication resulting in focus difficulties.

05/10/2018: ◆ CCTV System Details Provided to Sharples Victim explicitly informed Sharples of: (1) police approval of system, (2) full camera coverage including alleyway and car park, (3) compliance with gov.uk CCTV guidance, (4) neighbor approval. This contradicts any later claims system was inappropriate or invasive. Data loss prevented immediate evidence provision but Victim indicated recovery in progress.
- Probative: 05-10-2018-victim-email-regarding-criminal-damage.pdf
15/10/2018: ⬬ DARVO ASB Officer Sharples requests home visit to discuss 'neighbourly behaviour.' Victim refuses, citing Crystal-25's two assaults and three criminal damages. Victim explicitly revokes implied access, warns of trespass. This email never appears in Sharples' documentation despite being material evidence of victim status. Its exclusion proves deliberate evidence suppression and establishes retaliation motive for all subsequent actions. Victim responds to ASB Officer Sharples attempts at victim/offender role reversals with unquivocally legal refusal of any contact. SHARPLES: "...allowing people to live their lives free from fear and intimidation." False mediation, false equivalencies "All parties".(Translation: "Let me into your home so I can establish a record of you being 'counseled' about your behavior, creating documentation that frames you as the problem.")
- Probative: 15-10-2018-asb-home-visit-request-denied.pdf
23/10/2018: ⬬ Repeated Refusal to Cease and Desist
- Probative: 23-10-2018-sharples-refusal-to-cease-and-desist.pdf

25/10/2018: ⬬ ASB Officer Sharples Narrative Control Victim is sent multiple communications from ASB Officer Sharples in varying formats with multiple attempts to document his controlled narrative. Minimising an assult to a "neighbour dispute".

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: ASB Sharples Narrative Control 25-10-2018.pdf	Chronology: 30/08/2018 First Documented Instance of Attempt to Suppress. Chronology: 17/07/2018 Conflicting Official Records. Chronology: 20/10/2017 First Assault by Crystal-25.

Note: Implying non attendance, victim had attended and found the offices appeared closed but occupied at that time. The doors were locked.

01/11/2018: Medical Cannabis Legislation Amendment Victim was registered with Drug Science patient led research study Project Twenty 21 (T21) during early 2016. Victim was referred by T21 to a T21 collaborating clinic March 2019, however medication pricing became prohibitive and changed clinics in August 2020. The original T21 project is now in association with a Care Quality Commission regulated pain clinic.
- Probative: Government Announces Medical Cannabis Rescheduling
- Probative: Current Date Clinic Availability
2019
20/07/2019: ⬬ House Guest Incident
- 20/07/2019: ⬬ Sexual Assault Arrest This custody record details the arrest of victim for an alleged sexual assault on a female (T Caswell) aged 13 and over, based on an allegation that he touched the victim's vagina over her bodysuit.
- Custody: 20_07_2019_37BC-1999-19.pdf
- 20/07/2019: ⬬ Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm - ABH This crime report details an incident where the Victim was assaulted by a female (T Caswell) by biting him and hitting him with a phone. Police informed Victim a report would be made to Landord re: Anti-Social Behaviour.
- Crime: 20_07_2019_37-42638-19.pdf
- Probative: evening-before-worthing-19-07-2019.pdf
- Probative: T Caswell Compensation Order.pdf
- Probative: House Guest - Breydons Solicitors.pdf
- RUI: Release Under Investigation 090518.pdf
- CAD: SC-20072019-135 (20/07/2019)
- Appendix J
- Note: The CAD record confirms a "Domestic Incident" with shouting, and that two detentions were made, one for "Assault" and another for "Sexual Touching." This record directly links to the dual allegations.
03/08/2019: ⬬ PC 1983 BENTON Collecting CCTV HDD More than two weeks after the incident and five days before being required on 08/08/2019 to answer bail PC 1983 Benton collected the CCTV hard drive containing footage for eight cameras covering eleven days.
- Probative: 28-08-2019-pc-1983-benton.pdf
05/08/2019: Generation of Open Spaces WSCC A near neighbour was observed burning car tyres on the Common Ground Open Spaces in Shrub House Close, along with excess rubbish from a D.I.Y. compost heap on common ground and various other issues prompting the generation of communication by local authorities regarding issues surrounding the common land. This incident is linked to later obstructive parking issues and the discrediting of Dawn Mackinder by the Victim with the local council. Since no evidence other than the unapproved compost heap the letter pertained directly to what had been observed by the local authority.
- Probative: Open Spaces Letter.pdf
2019 August: Primary Antagonist Leaves Crystal-25 left her property and did not return.
10/07/2019: Acquisition of Mercedes-Benz SLK 300 Following the retirement of the SLK 280, the Victim acquired a newer Mercedes-Benz SLK 300. This vehicle, being one of the last R171s off the production line, features a galvanized body and was discreetly 'tweaked' for enhanced performance.
- Probative: D12 VJD SLK280
- Probative: DV11 KXS SLK300
- Appendix K

01/09/2019: Dr Georgina Browne Report Published Re: M4 RTA see: 21/09/2016 3 Successive RTA.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Dr Georgina Browne Accident-Psychiatric Report.pdf	Chronology: 21/09/2016

13/09/2019: ⬬ Cannabis Complaint Letter Re: 14/01/2021 ASB Officer Email to T/Sgt 1845 BENTON. ASB Officer was made aware of the incident 20/07/2019 during his visit and had been fully apprised of those events. ASB Officer Sharples knew at this time that the House Guest had been the aggressor and her allegation of sexual assault had been both false and founded in bitterness.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: House Guest Incident Sharples Letter	Chronology: 01/11/2018

11/11/2019: NICE CBMP Guidance & Project Twenty21 Context NICE published guidance on Cannabis-Based Medicinal Products (CBMPs). On the same date, Drug Science circulated confirmation that its Project Twenty21 registry was operating to support patients with chronic pain syndromes and PTSD who fell outside the limited NICE indications.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: t21-drugscience-addendum-11-11-20219.pdf	Chronology: 14/01/2021

2020

12/08/2020: ✱ ⭾ ⬬ Aggressive Trespasser Crime Report 37/56906/22 was reported by the Victim regarding an aggressive trespasser in the Victim's rear garden. This crime report is linked by attending officer PC 37 1654 FEENEY to the Second Londis Incident 03/09/2022 and Prescribed Cannabis Medication. PC 37 1654 FEENEY attended this incident at the Victim's home, attempting to assert the rear garden was public space, and declined sight of the Victim's prescribed cannabis.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: PC 1654 FEENEY 12-08-2020.mp4 Probative: PC 37 1654 FEENEY.pdf	Chronology: 05/08/2019

25/08/2020: ✱ ⭾ Mr P Sharples Crime Report 37/49387/20 was reported by the Landlord ASB Officer as an individual alleging harassment via email. Ultimately no harassing emails were given to the police and consequently on 05/01/2021 CPS offered no evidence and the case was dismissed.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Crime: 25_08_2020_37-49387-20.pdf CAD: SC-20082020-300 (25/08/2020)	Chronology: 11/11/2019 Chronology: 30/08/2018 The Suppression Letter (The Seed) Chronology: 25/10/2017 Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

Note: The CAD record details a harassment complaint from the ASB Officer, including explicit threats from the Victim's emails, confirming the basis of the harassment complaint that was later dismissed. This record shows the malicious content Sharples used to instigate police action. Particulars of Claim (Satchell Moran) — identifies ASB Officer as originating complainant (triggering event 27/09/2020).

22/09/2020: Hearing Allegation Letter (Still Missing) The ASB Officer made a false assertion on company letterhead sent to the Victim. A copy of this letter was submitted to police (see 27/09/2020) regarding an alleged civil process hearing on this date, claiming it granted a "power of arrest." The police's apparent acceptance or failure to immediately verify this assertion contributed to subsequent unjust actions on 27/09/2020.
- Appendix B

27/09/2020: ⭾ ⬬ ◆ Arrest, Property Siezed, Single Charge Based solely on the ASB Officer's unsubstantiated report, the Victim was unjustly arrested, and their property, including essential electronic devices, was invasively searched and seized. This traumatic event, rooted in malicious intent, directly inflicted severe emotional distress and a pervasive sense of violation, worsening the Victim's pre-existing anxiety and PTSD. Crucially, this arrest was based on a false claim of a "power of arrest" from a civil hearing that was not yet in force, as the N205c Notice of Issue (14/10/2020) proves the civil process was not initiated until after this date.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Custody: 27_09_2020_37BC-2587-20.pdf Appendix B	Chronology: 25/08/2020 Chronology: 30/08/2018 The Suppression Letter (The Seed) Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

Note: This arrest involved five officers on a "fishing trip" instigated by Sharples. Police initially sought evidence for severe, unverified allegations including child pornography, weapons, and illicit drugs, with email harassment seemingly added as an afterthought. This highlights the extensive failure of due diligence on the part of T/Sgt Benton, who authorized the operation based on Sharples's unverified and malicious claims.

Matrix: C-01 C-02 C-03 C-04 C-06 C-07

01/10/2020: ◆ Victim Officially Reports Mr P Sharples for Harassment PC 1155 RADFORD alleges the 8 emails sent to her were 'bombardment', emails with information relative to and supporting my complaint (including supporting documentation)
- Crime: 01_10_2020_37-57105-20.pdf
08/10/2020: Private Medication Delay The Victim is advised by Private Dispensary of a delay in his medication dispensing.
- Probative: Khiron delay T21 letter 8.10.20.pdf

09/10/2020: ✱ ⭾ ⬬ Initial Application for Civil Process GO1NR161 Civil Process GO1NR161 was initiated. N16a General Form of Application for Injunction dated and filed. For a detailed analysis of the misrepresentations and the impact on Legal Aid regarding this initial civil process.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: N16A General Form for Application of Injunction and Notice of issue.pdf Appendix A.1 Appendix G CPR 25.3 Reference	Chronology: 30/08/2018 The Suppression Letter (The Seed)

14/10/2020: N205c Notice of Issue GO1NR161 N205c Notice of Issue invoice was paid, conclusively showing no civil process was in effect until this date. For full details regarding this and the debunking of the false 16/09/2020 hearing assertion.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Civil Injunction 14 october 2020.pdf Probative: N205c Notice of issue and Power of Arrest.pdf Appendix A.1	Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest (BEFORE process started) Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

Matrix: C-01 C-02 C-03

20/10/2020: Email To Flagship Response Victim sends email to Flagship repairs team detailing issues they may have been misguided regarding.
- Probative: Flagship Response (Repairs Team) 02-10-2020.pdf
- Note: Despite these emails being sent after the N16A application and N205c Notice of Issue, and the Victim's awareness of the ASB Officer's false assertions to the police, the Victim remained officially unaware of any civil process in effect until 04/11/2020, as these critical court documents had not yet been served.
2/11/2020: Drug Science Twenty21 Discussion Panel Invitation
- Probative: drug-science-twenty21-panel-discussion-invite.pdf

04/11/2020: Civil Process Documents Served - Perjury Proven by Temporal Impossibility N16A, N205c, and covering letter (dated 02/11/2020, signed "Ian Brown" in font) served by Royal Mail. The 2 November letter states: "Following the hearing in this matter held on 16 September 2020 we have received final order and power of arrest." N205c proves this is false: First issue of claim was 14/10/2020. A hearing cannot occur before a claim is issued. This is temporal impossibility - proven perjury. N16A contains second act of perjury: HRA 1998 box ticked "NO" - certifying no Human Rights Act issues engaged. This certification was false when made: The victim was unlawfully arrested on 27/09/2020 (17 days before N16A filing) based on a crime report by Sharples acting as private citizen on 25/08/2020. This arrest engaged Article 5 ECHR (right to liberty). The arrest was later proven unlawful by concluded tort - HNK settlement £4,400 (ref MM2147080, 02/06/2025) for false imprisonment.
Consequence of false HRA certification: Denied victim access to legal aid. Forced to act as litigant in person. Unable to challenge jurisdictional defects (no 16 Sept hearing = no jurisdiction) without counsel. The perjury prevented exposure of the perjury. Authentication defect: All three documents unsigned. The "Ian Brown" signature is font, not handwriting. Ian Brown (Company Director, not solicitor) lacked authority to make statutory declarations or certify HRA compliance. Flagship Legal Department footer states: "registered with Solicitors Regulation Authority under ID 620141 but is not a regulated law practice" - no capacity to prepare contested court documents.
Actor: ASB Officer Sharples (possibly unaccredited - no CSAS certification proven) prepared or provided evidence for documents filed by Ian Brown (Company Director) via Legal Department lacking authority to bring proceedings. All acts ultra vires. All documents void.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: 02-11-2020 Injunction Accompanying Letter.pdf Original Probative: 02-11-2020 Injunction Accompanying Letter.pdf From SoT Probative: N16A General Form for Application of Injunction and Notice of issue.pdf Probative: N205c Notice of issue and Power of Arrest.pdf	Chronology: 30/08/2018 The Suppression Letter (The Seed)

Note: ASB officer Sharples, acting as a private citizen in the same vein of 25/08/2020 crime report, committed perjury on 14 Oct 2020 by certifying HRA not engaged when Article 5 was breached 17 days prior to an arrest based on his crime report leading to arrest on 27/09/2020 which was subsequently adjudicated as a concluded tortious act.

Matrix: C-01 C-02 C-03 C-06 C-09 C-15

06/11/2020: BT MEET ME Continuance GO1NR161 A continuance hearing was held before HHJ Pigram via BT Meet Me in the matter of Civil Process GO1NR161. The court adjourned matters for a Victim-requested Finding of Fact hearing and outcome of 05/01/2021 Magistrates Trial for Alleged Harassment of Mr Pete Sharples (an individual). HHJ Pigram ordered a letter from Victim Private Consultant confirming prescription status and also agreed the Victim could respond to Landlord emails if contacted first by the landlord (a crucial point not raised during the second Committal to Prison hearing 13/10/2022, as the Victim was absent under medical care between 10/10/2022 and 15/10/2022 inclusive).
Documents Chronology
Chronology: 30/08/2018 The Suppression Letter (The Seed)
- Matrix: C- C-01 C-04 C-06

Documents	Chronology
	Chronology: 30/08/2018 The Suppression Letter (The Seed)

16/11/2020: Local Business Character Reference The Victim was given a character reference letter from a local business supporting his defense for the Finding of Fact hearing in the matter of Flagship Housing Group Ltd Vs victim. For the full text and a comprehensive assessment of its context.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Local Business Character Reference.pdf Appendix E.1 Appendix E.2	Chronology: 30/08/2018 The Suppression Letter (The Seed) Chronology: 24/08/2017 Becki Gaunt, Landlord Area Manager

Note: The character references raises identical concerns as raised by the victim in email to Beck Gaunt on 24/08/2017 regarding the same individuals.

18/11/2020: Communication from ASB Officer The Victim receives letter requesting information for Trial Hearing 18/02/2021 in Civil Process GO1NR161.
- Probative: Flagship Request for Documentation.pdf
- Note: Since this documentation was requested from the Victim it is confirmed here that Landlord Employer (ASB Officer) was very well aware his declaring "No" on the Statutory Oath Declaration on N16A General Form of Application for Injunction difinitively denies the respondant access to Legal Aid, aware of this there is no advice in this documentation, perhaps deliberately for LiP, on document format.
23/11/2020: Private Consultant Communication For Court The Victim receives via email and hard copy in the post requested letter from Private Healthare The Cannabis Clinic confirming prescription and patient status in compliance of HHJ Pigram order of 06/11/2020 Continuance for Civil Process GO1NR161. Dr Sunny Nayee, Pain Consultant, issues lawful prescription for medicinal cannabis. Confirms benefit and compliance with Home Office/MHRA regs.
- Probative: Dr Sunny Nayee Prescription Letter.pdf

27/11/2020: Victim Requests MH Help from GP The Victim officially engaged a healthcare professional via his GP for mental health issues exacerbated by the ASB Officer as managing his pre existing conditions while attempting to defend himself against an onslaught of abuse of his rights was causing him increasing distress. The GP recorded the abuser's name and confirmed when later required, to confirm a referral was made. Mental Health services subsequently interviewed the ASB Officer first regarding the Victim's mental health referral. A detail the ASB Officer later confirms in official communication discovered within Statement of Truth for Finding of Fact HHJ Stevens in hearing 18/02/2021.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Dr G Hopkinson NSFT Referral.pdf	Chronology: 30/08/2018 The Suppression Letter (The Seed)

28/11/2020: Victim Experiences Verbal Abuse The Victim had stopped en route home at a NISA convenience store in Red Lodge and was challenged by group of males from the local traveller community.
- CAD: SC-28112020-379 (28/11/2020)
07/12/2020: Criminal Harassment of Mr P Sharples (Individual) Victim does not recall from whom this communication was sent to him. (Saunders Gooding & Riddleston, solicitors?)
- Probative: Confirmation 27th November 2020 Hearing Adjourned.pdf
21/12/2020: Solicitor Mark Holt Advises guilty plea despite no evidence having been provided to him by police/CPS.
- Probative: 21-12-2020-mark-holt-ipswich-magistrates.pdf
- Probative: 23-12-2020-mark-holt-ipswich-magistrates.pdf

23/12/2020: Solicitor Mark Holt Indicates no response from Ipswich MAgistrates despite repeated email requests for case materials. No emails were produced, Crown Prosecution Service offered "No Evidence".

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: 23-12-2020-mark-holt-ipswich-magistrates.pdf	Chronology: 27/09/2020 Chronology: 25/08/2020

2020 December: ✱ ⬬ MH Interview Abuser in First Instance Mental Health services subsequently interviewed the ASB Officer first regarding the Victim's mental health referral.

2021

05/01/2021: Criminal Hearing arising from 27/09/2020 Harassment charges against the Victim were dismissed in criminal court; the Victim's property was returned.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Ispwich Magistrate Trial 5th January 2021.pdf Probative: 27th September 2020 Incident Impact Statement.pdf Probative: Particulars of Claim (Satchell Moran).pdf	Chronology: 25/08/2020 Civilian ASB Intelligence Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest Chronology: 27/11/2020 Victim Requests MH Help from GP Chronology: 23/12/2020 No Emails Available to CPS

Note: Particulars of Claim (Satchell Moran) — identifies ASB Officer as originating complainant (triggering event 27/09/2020)
Matrix: C-04 C-05

14/01/2021: ✱ ⬬ ◆ ASB Officer Email to T/Sgt 1845 BENTON The ASB Officer sent a recriminating email to a police sergeant (T/Sgt 1845 BENTON), alleging false paedophile-type behavior by the Victim (Page #2 Linked Evidence Full Email Thread 5th - 15th January 2021.pdf.) Sharples claimed he had met "two MH workers who remembered MBD from when he lived in Red Lodge and how he was run out of town for paedophile type behaviour." This entire claim is fabricated: the Victim never lived in Red Lodge at any point (documented address history 1993-present proves no Red Lodge residency), hospital records confirm no pre-2015 mental health contact (MH workers could not have "remembered" him), and police confirmed the paedophile allegation was false (Page #1, 15/01/2021). This demonstrates Sharples invented both the source (MH workers) and the location (Red Lodge) to give false credibility to a malicious rumour. The false allegation inflicted severe emotional trauma, directly targeted the Victim's character, and was later embedded in a sworn Statement of Fact for civil proceedings (page #5), despite being demonstrably false. The 'source' alluded to: The victim's self referal to GP 27/11/2020

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Previous Addresses M J Burdette-Deakin.pdf Probative: Full Email Thread 5th - 15th January 2021.pdf Probative: 14th January 2021 Drugs Allegation.pdf Probative: Tenant response to Sharples - Cannabis Medication.pdf Probative: Woodfires - Cannabis.pdf Probative: Alleged Bonfire.pdf See Appendix H Appendix C	Chronology: 05/01/2021 Ipswich Magistrates Case Dismissed Chronology: 27/11/2020 Victim Requests MH Help From GP Chronology: 14/10/2020 N205c Notice (Process Start) Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report Chronology: 30/08/2018 The Suppression Letter (The Seed) Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

Note: This communication (Page #2) reveals Sharples's demonstrable fabrication of both source and location to legitimize a false paedophile allegation. His invention of "two MH workers" as a source (hospital records to be disclosed) and false claim the Victim lived in Red Lodge (address history 1993-present proves no Red Lodge residency) demonstrates deliberate construction of false professional attribution. T/Sgt 1845 BENTON confirmed the allegation was false (15/01/2021) but took no action against Sharples for malicious communication or false attribution to medical professionals. The same fabricated narrative contaminated NSFT Psychiatric Assessment on 22/04/2021 via the Professionals Meeting, where Sharples' unchallenged false claims became embedded in clinical records without verification.

Matrix: C-03 C-06 C-08 C-09 C-15

15/01/2021: ◆ T/Sgt 1845 BENTON's Actions Regarding PPU Query T/Sgt 1845 BENTON unequivocally confirmed to the ASB Officer that the Victim "is not under any public protection team and has not been under them before." This confirmation was in response to the ASB Officer's query regarding the Victim's potential PPU supervision. No action was taken against the ASB Officer for the malicious allegations, indicating a police failure to act on documented malicious allegations.>

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Full Email Thread 5th - 15th January 2021.pdf Appendix B Appendix E	Chronology: 01/10/2000

Note: The concerns here seem to increase ever closer the examination of this entire email thread. The victim's previous addresses were at this time on record with ASB Officer Sharples employer Flagship Housing the landlord. His position as a Public Officer carries a high duty of care that included a perception of enhanced trust, as such Sharples would have direct access to the victims tenancy file. Contained in that file among other information is the vitims original tenancy application, on which is complete list of the victims previous addresses.

Matrix: C-15

05/02/2021: GO1NR161 Civil Trial Notification The Victim receives confirmation of Trial Hearing for 18/02/2021.
- Probative: Trial Hearing Notice 18 Feb 2021.pdf

14/02/2021: Statement of Truth: Finding of Fact Circa 23/09/2017 (Hindsight) The Victims discovery of the full email thread 5th - 15th January 2021 within a sworn statement for civil trial hearing 18/02/2021 invites speculation that the malicious rumor of the Victim being a paedophile, chased from another village, given the ASB Officer's interaction with Crystal-25 and subsequent actions/communications with authorities, likely started around this time. The sworn statement was actually sent to the victim via email attachment on 11/02/2021 but this was not discovered until 14/02/2021.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Final Bundle 11.2.2020 paginated-pgs 151-276.pdf Probative: Landlord Employee Letter Social Media 30-08-2018 From Statement of Truth 18-02-2021.pdf Probative: Full Email Thread 5th - 15th January 2021.pdf	Chronology: 30/08/2018 Chronology: 23/09/2017

Matrix: C-06 C-08 C-09 C-15

16/02/2021: PC 806 SAMPHER attended late evening PC 806 SAMPHER provided no documented reason for the visit. The victim raised the matter of the full email thread with the officer. PC 806 SAMPHER upon realising who the email thread engagement involved immediately asked: "Where did you get that?!" the tone and impression was that he already knew of its existence and seemed shocked that the victim had lawful possession of the material.

18/02/2021: ⬬ GO1NR161 Finding of Fact HHJ Stevens in Hearing During the Finding of Fact hearing, the Victim, as a Litigant in Person, presented various documents in attempt to illustrate the misleading, even perjurous documents such as the offensive email 14/01/2021. Also, various documents included within the Claimant Statement of Truth relating to Civil Process of other tenants of the Claimant the ASB Officer, but the court was recessed due to Victim exhaustion. Statement of Fact for this hearing was reviewed again in June 2025 with revaltion from EEAS discovery, to contain multiple instances of abuse of process and police misfeasance as described throughout this Chronology. Documents submitted by ASB Officer incuding those generated after an unnanounced visit 30/08/2018 making false assertions regarding Victims CCTV. ASB claims CCTV system was explained when in fact no such explanation was given, he was infact asked to leave within minutes without explanation or sight of CCTV System. See Stalking Allegation: 27/07/2017.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Landlord Employee Letter Social Media 30-08-2018.pdf Probative: Landlord Employee Letter Social Media 30-08-2018 From Statement of Truth 18-02-2021.pdf Probative: Full Email Thread 5th - 15th January 2021.pdf Probative: Flagship Data Breach Hibble case.pdf Probative: Flagship Data Breach Mohammed Nawaz.pdf Probative: Flagship Data Breach 2 Mohammed Nawaz.pdf	Chronology: 14/01/2021 False Paedophile Allegations Chronology: 05/01/2021 Criminal Charges Dismissed Chronology: 14/10/2020 N205c Notice (Process Start) Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report Chronology: 30/08/2018 The Suppression Letter (The Seed) Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

Matrix: C-06 C-08 C-09 C-15

19/02/2021: ✱ ⬬ GO1NR161 (continued on papers): The court reconvened without parties in attendance. The hearing and judgment proceeded solely on papers, and the injunction was approved. Due to an unfortunate error by the Victim (a virgin Litigant in Person unfamiliar with civil document filing), while all documentation emailed to the court clerk reached the court building, none reached the courtroom itself. Therefore, only the claimant's (ASB Officer's) papers were read into the hearing. Some weeks after the hearing, the court returned all of the Victim's documentation by email marked "Incorrect Format."

Matrix: C-02 C-05

27/02/2021: PC 806 SAMPHER - Alleged Harrassment

27/02/2021: PC 806 SAMPHER Unannounced (off duty?)

After PC 806 SAMPHER left from his unannounced/uninvited visit to the Victims home IOPC Reference: 27 February 2021/150012 was generated.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: PC 806 SAMPHER.pdf Probative: IOPC Referral to Norfolk PSD 11-07-2025.pdf IOPC Reference: 2025/009880	This matter has since been revisited in light of new discovery and is linked to Chronology: 22/04/2021

27/02/2021: ⬬ Alleged Harassment - without violence towards Mother This crime report details allegations of harassment committed by the Victim towards his mother via electronic means. (Victim would be interested to see those communications, this report is entirely misleading. The brother (middle sibling) was investigated for alleged sexual assault of Michelle Deakin, daughter of Paul Deakin (youngest sibling), this is a clear example of the molestation of the fidelity of reality either out of illiteracy or ignorance. My mother would never make a complaint to the police regarding 'excess messages' she would simply block you, which suggests this complaint came from a misinterpreted email sent by the Victim to SNT (police) attempting to raise awareness of the wrong doings of Mr P Sharples using metaphors, examples and anything else that might nudge a conscience.
Crime: 27_02_2021_37-10477-21.pdf
CAD: SC-03032021-10 (03/03/2021)
Note: The CAD record for this event links to Crime Report 37/10477/21 and notes "HARASSMENT - WITHOUT VIOLENCE" as the reason for police activity, confirming the official response to this alleged complaint a week later.

15/03/2021: Housing Association Responsibility Shift Victim receives general communication from Landlord notifying all tenants of change Quote: "From 6 April 2021, the housing association thast manages your home will change..." Unquote.
- Probative: Flagship Homes Changes to Samphire Homes.pdf
05/04/2021: ✱ ⬬ Victim Contact with Insp Mark Shipton Victim attempts to raise awareness of issues and concerns with an Inspector from Suffolk Constabulary. No Response.
- Probative: Inspector Mark Shipton Awareness Raised.pdf
07/04/2021: ⬬ Response to Victims enquiry with Citizens Advice Victim also attempted to raise awareness of issues and concerns with Citizens Advice seeking help, to find the well had been poisoned by way of implied contact with ASB Officer Sharples, Civil Injunction of 14/10/2020 prevented any communication with any staff at Flagship Group Ltd.
- Probative: Citizens Advice Response.pdf
12/04/2021: Victim's Mother Calls Victim received a series of calls from his mother detailing his father suddenly fallen ill, that's it. No other information, which isn't really 'odd' since family contact within/among the victims family is almost non existent. What is 'odd' is that the police, if 27/02/2021 was GENUINELY a report from the Victims mother, would have advised her NOT to call her son. The call regarding his father falling ill would have been made by someone other than his mother. (Middle sibling syndrome, inheritance war, middle sibling's long list of failed 'businesses', his criminal career Crawley Court Told of Blackmail Plot external link opens new tab) Victim realises with no surprise his fathers illness rekindled the embers of the ongoing 'Inheritance War' that began in the Summer of 1974.
- CAD: SC-09032021-142 (09/03/2021)
- Note: The CAD record for an "Abandoned Call" from the Victim on 09/03/2021, which later became a harassment report, shows police were actively dealing with his complaints and his family's involvement during this period, just prior to the mother's calls.
19/04/2021: Private Cannabis Presciption After some difficulty the victim managed to obtain at no additional cost a photograph of his lawful prescription from T21 clinic.
- Probative: cannabis-priscription-19042021.pdf

22/04/2021: ✱ ◈ ⬬ ⤤ Third Party MH Interference An unconsented “Professionals’ Meeting” was held and chaired by Dr C. Zapata (Consultant Psychiatrist, MHT). Attendees included the ASB Officer, the ASB Officer’s Manager, PC 806 Sampher Mental Health Link Officer - whose presence facilitated disclosure of private health information without consent, a second psychiatrist, and a clinical administrator.No consent was requested or given by the victim. The minutes make no reference to the 14/01/2021 email. Discussion largely centred on the ASB Officer’s grievances. Most of Dr Zapata’s statements were speculative and later contradicted by findings of 07/06/2021. Hospital records confirm no pre-2015 mental-health history, contradicting a 25 year continuity of record.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Dr Zapata Initial Complaint Letter.pdf Probative: Dr Zapata Police Communication.pdf Probative: PHSO Complaint Final (PHSO Case File Ref: C-2154042) Probative: Professionals Meeting.pdf Appendix E.2 Appendix E.3	Chronology: 16/02/2021 PC 806 Sampher Concerned by Victim's Possession of Email Thread Chronology: 05/01/2021 Criminal Charges Dismissed (Post-Trial Coordination) Chronology: 14/01/2021 Paedophile Allegation Email Thread (Disproven) Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest (Created False Narrative) Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin) Chronology: 21/09/2016 Pre-Sharples Stability Chronology: 10/12/2009 Medical History Baseline Chronology: 27/03/2007 Psychiatric Assessment (No Mental Illness) Chronology: 01/10/2000 Assault & PTSD Baseline

Documents

Chronology Cross-Link

Probative: Dr Zapata Initial Complaint Letter.pdf
Probative: Dr Zapata Police Communication.pdf
Probative: PHSO Complaint Final (PHSO Case File Ref: C-2154042)
Probative: Professionals Meeting.pdf
Appendix E.2
Appendix E.3

Chronology: 16/02/2021 PC 806 Sampher Concerned by Victim's Possession of Email Thread
Chronology: 05/01/2021 Criminal Charges Dismissed (Post-Trial Coordination)
Chronology: 14/01/2021 Paedophile Allegation Email Thread (Disproven)
Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest (Created False Narrative)
Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report
Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)
Chronology: 21/09/2016 Pre-Sharples Stability
Chronology: 10/12/2009 Medical History Baseline
Chronology: 27/03/2007 Psychiatric Assessment (No Mental Illness)
Chronology: 01/10/2000 Assault & PTSD Baseline

Note: Withdrawal of lawful treatment on false premise → harm → reinstatement sustained 16 months → validation of patient narrative, invalidation of clinician record.
⤤ The substance of Dr C Zapata's tainted reports were later recycled into professional legal opinion. Minutes record cross-agency operational planning: landlord staff to prepare affidavits for Court; police to explore PACE / malicious-comms routes; patient to be discharged and only reassessed on arrest. Multiple new and unevidenced allegations (firearms, trafficking, threats) entered clinical record. The meeting notes claim cognitive disorganization. Photographs from the same period showing advanced behavioral management requiring intact executive function deomstrating the clinical assessment was deeply contaminated, confirmed in both 'Objective Analysis' and 'Clinical Continuity'.

Matrix: C-06 C-08 C-10 C-12 C-15

11/05/2021: ⬬ Criminal Damage and Threats to Commit Criminal Damage. This crime report details an incident where the Victim was accused of sending an email threatening to set fire to his house and then smashing a rear window in front of police. .
- Crime: 11_05_2021_37-24415-21.pdf
- CAD: SC-11052021-233 (11/05/2021)
- Appendix L
- Note: The CAD record shows a "Concern for Safety" report based on the Victim's email threatening to set his house on fire. It notes that PC 806 SAMPHER was on the scene, confirming his presence and the initial context for the criminal damage arrest. The entry also notes that Benton was a resource on this call. MG4 Charges refused based on the information gathered.
- Matrix: C-04 C-06 C-10
12/05/2021: ⬬ Harassment, Threats to Kill, Criminal Damage Arrest This custody record details the arrest of victim on allegations of harassing his mother and brother, threatening to kill his brother, and criminal damage to a dwelling, specifically smashing a window. He was also arrested for threats to commit criminal damage related to emails about setting his property on fire. (Again, poor diction in record keeping distorts the fidelity of the reality see; Chronology Entry 27/02/2021). This arrest initiated a direct confrontation where the Victim, amidst personal injury, accused PC 806 SAMPHER of dereliction of duty regarding Sharples's unprosecuted misfeasance in the 14/01/2021 email, leading to PC SAMPHER's significant shift in demeanor and suspected attempts to extricate himself from incrimination.
- Custody: 12_05_2021_37BC-1096-21.pdf
- MG4 Refused: MG4F Refused Charge 17092020.pdf
- Appendix L: 12/05/2021 Public Order, Criminal Damage
- Note: The allegations here are largely based on emails sent to SNT that were not appropriately reviewed in context, during the period 27/09/2020 ~ 10/10/2022 over 1,000 emails were sent to both SNT Mildenhall and SNT Newmarket in attempt to raise awareness of the abuse and narrative distortion being engaged in by ASB Officer Sharples. By this stage victim/offender role reversal was well embedded into police data systems. A number of official records note these facts indicating this arrest was based entirely on the content of anecdotal email chains to police and, not any actual threat.

28/05/2021: ◈ ⬬ Unlawfully Detained (Mental Health Assessment) A little over a month after the unconsented meeting, PC 806 SAMPHER (mental health link) attended the Victim's home with two Mental Health workers. He stated, "I have come to take you for a mental health assessment under sec.136 MHA2." Despite no signs of requiring secondary mental health services (confirmed by 07/06/2021 letter), the Victim was subjected to an unwarranted and distressing detention, influenced by narratives from the Professionals Meeting. This police action facilitated an unlawful deprivation of liberty. The Victim was transported to a mental health assessment unit, not officially arrested, and not read his rights.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: MH Induction 30-05-2021.pdf Probative: Marijuana Psychosis.pdf Probative: No Medical Records.pdf Appendix B Appendix E.3	Chronology: 27/03/2007 Psychiatric Assessment (No Mental Illness)

Matrix: C-10 C-12 C-14 C-15

29/05/2021: ◆ Dr C Zapata sectioned the Victim for 28 days ...and immediately went on leave. This sectioning contrasts with the later professional assessment (07/06/2021 letter), which found no underlying mental illness. This unlawful deprivation of liberty, based on speculative information, caused immense psychological anguish and trauma, exacerbating PTSD and anxiety. CZ going on leave immediately after sectioning highlighted a lack of due care and prolonged suffering.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Objective Analysis - (Shell) Probative: Chronological Images - (Shell) Probative: clinical-continuity-2000-2025.pdf - (Shell) Appendix R	Chronology: 22/04/2021 Professionals Meeting Chronology: 10/12/2009 Medical History Baseline Chronology: 27/03/2007 Psychiatric Assessment (No Mental Illness) Chronology: 01/10/2000 Assault & PTSD Baseline

Matrix: C-04 C-06 C-12 C-15

30/05/2021: Within 24 hours of Section During 28-day section appeal (approx. 6 days after 28/05/2021 detention): The Victim appealed the 28-day section, producing the 14/01/2021 email and stating, "THIS is why I'm sounding like I'm going crazy, because no one wants you to believe this, if I have no credibility no one even bothers to LOOK closely at this, it's just another piece of paper."
- Probative: Conflicting Information - No Mental Illness.pdf
- Note: This diagnosis directly conflicts prior documented professional opinion.

03/06/2021: ◆ Immediately after appeal The Victim was released and provided with a taxi home. The diagnosis of 'marijuana psychosis' was shown to be a 'smokescreen' for lack of due diligence. Dr. C. Zapata's unsolicited interference in the Victim's private healthcare, as evidenced by his email instructing the Harley Street doctors to cease prescribing due to alleged "paranoid presentation," directly led to a misdiagnosis and a disruption of legitimate medical care. His email also reveals a significant "lost in translation" moment regarding the Victim's cannabis prescription, stating "60 gram delivery (gets this amount every month)", which was in fact a two-month supply. Furthermore, Dr. Zapata's expressed "surprise and concern" at the Victim's early discharge suggests he believed the Victim did not deserve release, directly contrasting with Karen Webster's later clear assessment that there was "not an underlying mental illness which required support from secondary Mental Health Services." This highlights a pattern of official attempts to discredit and undermine the victim's lawful medical treatment and judgment regarding his mental state leading to question if Dr C Zapata was aware of the paedophile rumour instigated by ASB Officer Sharples, officially supported in the Professionals Meeting by PC 806 Sampher, and whether he had been acting on that basis.

Documents	Chronology Cross-Link
Probative: Dr C Zapata Impact Clinic Rejection Email.pdf Probative: Dr victim MHA 2 Discharge.pdf Probative: Emails Allegation Hospital records.pdf Probative: Dr Zapata interference in Private Healthcare.pdf	Chronology: 12/09/2025 Discovery - Email Audit Proves 9 Not 25 Chronology: 07/03/2024 Housing Rejected (Malicious Reference) Chronology: 16/11/2022 Dr. Singh Report (Recycled Tainted Records) Chronology: 13/10/2022 Committal Judgment ("25 Emails" - Actually 9) Chronology: 03/06/2021 Dr. Zapata Interference in Private Healthcare Chronology: 14/01/2021 Paedophile Allegation Email Thread (Disproven)

Documents

Chronology Cross-Link

Probative: Dr C Zapata Impact Clinic Rejection Email.pdf
Probative: Dr victim MHA 2 Discharge.pdf
Probative: Emails Allegation Hospital records.pdf
Probative: Dr Zapata interference in Private Healthcare.pdf

Chronology: 12/09/2025 Discovery - Email Audit Proves 9 Not 25
Chronology: 07/03/2024 Housing Rejected (Malicious Reference)
Chronology: 16/11/2022 Dr. Singh Report (Recycled Tainted Records)
Chronology: 13/10/2022 Committal Judgment ("25 Emails" - Actually 9)
Chronology: 03/06/2021 Dr. Zapata Interference in Private Healthcare
Chronology: 14/01/2021 Paedophile Allegation Email Thread (Disproven)

⤤ Note: A recycled allegation tied to a known individual was silently reassigned to the victims provenance, on a site where everyone knew both identities — and the fiction collapsed in front of an MHA2 appeal panel the moment it was spoken aloud. The invidual being known to a large cohort of NHS Staff in A&E less than 70 yards from Wedgewood MH Unit West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, the mother of the Red Lodge individual being A&E Senior Staff Nurse J Simmons (now deceased) the victims former girlfriend

07/06/2021: ◆ Karen Webster Letter Quote: "I write further to your recent admission and following conversation with the ward consultant. It was not felt that there was not an underlying mental illness which required support from secondary Mental Health Services. At the point of discharge, it was felt that you have the capacity to understand the potential consequences of some of your actions, behaviours which are not driven by any underlying mental illness" Unquote
- Probative: Karen Webster 07-06-2021.pdf
- Probative: PHSO Complaint Final
- Probative: Hospital Records Received - victim Burdette-Deakin - Outlook.pdf
- Note: Nurse Karen Webster filed a report in hospital records, omitting some assertions from the 22/04/2021 meeting (e.g., conspiracies and fixations). She stated: "Inpatient admission diagnosed no mental illness that required treatment," aligning with her 07/06/2021 letter. She also indicated: "KW has hadconversations with AAT and Dr Zapata as the information that MDU gave the ward totally contradicts the information that was given us previously and also others."
09/06/2021: "Quality Control Issue" Victim in hindsight believes this was the result of Dr C Zapata misrepresenting the Victims mental health issues to the Victims Private Consultant.
- Probative: 09-06-2021-Prescription Quality Control Issue.pdf

21/06/2021: First Committal Bundle Served The ASB Officer applied to civil process for Committal to Prison alleging breaches of Injunction GO1NR161 and thus contempt of court. The Victim, aware this was a vindictive prosecution, arranged for a criminal barrister to attend the final hearing on 05/08/2021.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: 21-06-2021 Committal Order Bundle.pdf Probative: Appendix B Hearing 20th August 2021.pdf Appendix: A1	Chronology: 22/04/2021 Chronology: 18/02/2021 Chronology: 14/01/2021 Chronology: 05/01/2021 Criminal Charges Dismissed Chronology: 25/08/2020 False Paedophile Allegations

28/06/2021: Satchell Moran Hospital Records request printed off. victim - ALL NSFT HEALTH RECORDS Page 202 of 586 Printed on 28/06/2022 SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST COPY.
- Probative: 500 emails allegation Hospital records.pdf
- Probative: Singh Report
- Appendix: S
02/07/2021: Attempted Home Invasion Victim is awoken early morning hearing knocking on his door and a voice calling out, disturbingly on reviewing the CCTV footage later that morning with the police the Victim sees the would be intruder trying the door handle before knocking then calling through the letterbox. Looking out the bedroom window the victim asks the individual what he wants, he claims he is looking for his girlfriend. Despite the Victim asserting he is the only person in the house the individual now close to the bedroom window becomes violent.
- Probative: Attempted Home Invasion.mp4
05/07/2021: ⬬ First Committal- First Hearing G01NR161 Case proceeded following release from section on 03/06/2021. Victim attended with advisor and requested adjournment due to inability to secure legal counsel. HHJ North adjourned proceedings to 20/08/2021.
21/07/2021:Harassment - without violence This crime report details the Victim's report of harassment due to rumors spread in his cul-de-sac, particularly involving allegations of him being a "paedophile". The outcome was "Victim Does Not Support Police Action".
- Crime: 21_07_2021_37-39971-21.pdf

22/07/2021: ⬬ Rape of a Female - Historic Allegation This crime report details a historic allegation of rape made by the Victim's ex-wife, disclosed during a report of domestic harassment. Crime report 37/40000/21 was reported by the Victim's ex-wife. The Victim, in a moment of misjudgment, posted a note ("I need your help please. [Victim]") through his ex-wife's door. The ex-wife responded by alleging child abuse (01/08/2008 and 31/08/2008), knowing it was impossible given the Victim's lack of contact. This fabricated allegation, aimed at maximum harm, caused intense emotional anguish, distress, and personal injury, exacerbating the Victim's mental state.

Documents	Chronology
Crime: 22_07_2021_37-40000-21.pdf Probative: Vindictive Landlord, Vindictive Mother and Karma.mp3 An interlocution with Robert D. Agostini. CAD: SC-22072021-87 CAD: SC-22072021-344 Appendix F Appendix SCLE7	Chronology: 20/07/2021 Ex-Wife Spiteful Report Chronology: 25/08/2020 Mr P Sharples Crime Report 37/49387/20 Chronology: 02/08/2012 Malicious Website Referrals Chronology: 20/03/2009 Marital Breakup Recriminations Chronology: 04/11/2005 High-Gravity Safeguarding Record

Note: The CAD record for this "Domestic Incident" explicitly notes a "HARASSMENT AND HISTORIC RAPE CRIME TO FOLLOW," confirming the origin of the allegation and demonstrating how police were directed to pursue a highly damaging, unproven claim from a potentially malicious source. These allegations were first made in 2007, dismissed as temporally impossible. Repeated in 2008 on the back of a minor domestic dispute where the victims then wife punched a window causing herself injury. Again demonstrated to be temporally impossible in Family Civil Process during hearings throughout 2012, false claims that had 'accumulated' additional fantastical allegations relating to the victims children residing in West Sussex. All allegations were rebutted with photographs, video, emails, and text messages disclosed during these hearings; again disproving temporally all allegations. These facts were disclosed in email to both SNT Mildenhall and SNT Newmarket illustrating that civil wrongs were exposed indicating I was no stranger to defective witness testimony. That my assertions regarding N16A and N205c with the mandatory accompanying letter were grounded in prior experience and knowledge of process. That an assertion of a non existent hearing before the accompanying civil process documentation had even been issued is temporally impossible thus exposing the Chief Constable to their wrong on 27/09/2020 on the inflations of ASB Sharples (crime report: 25_08_2020_37-49387-20.pdf).

Matrix: C-04 C-06 C-07

26/07/2021: ⬬ The 'Paedophile' Rumour Crime reference: 37/39971/21 - Dawn Mackinder: Near Neighbour obstructive parking, harassment, and Hate Speech against the Victim were reported to police. The Victim requires dropped kerb access due to registered disabled status and Blue Badge.
- Victim Rebuttal to T/Sgt 1845 BENTON's 23/07/2021 22:43 record: The Victim repeatedly reported neighbor Dawn Mackinder for obstructing the dropped kerb. Benton, without professional qualification, mentioned mental health and confirmed rumors related to the 14/01/2021 email, using "fixated" (previously used by PC 806 SAMPHER) and not denying Victim's false sex offender status. The police's handling of the harassment and hate speech reports was inadequate; Benton's internal record is a clear example of institutional bias and negligence. This biased record-keeping caused further psychological injury by invalidating the Victim's lived experience.
- Probative: Blue Badge Parking Permit.pdf
- Probative: Car Door Misrepresentation.pdf
- Probative: Disabled Access Discrimination 1.pdf
- Probative: Disabled Access Discrimination 2.pdf
- Probative: Obstructive Parking 1.pdf
- Probative: Obstructive Parking 2.pdf
- CAD: SC-22072021-87 (22/07/2021)
- Appendix B
- Appendix E.3
- Appendix SCLE4
- Appendix SCLE5
- Note: The CAD record confirms the Victim's report about harassment, including being called a "paedophile" for walking a parrot and cat, and police's immediate acknowledgement that they are "well aware of these issues" and that he has a "cannabis prescription" and his neighbours have "had a go at him about this." Context and reality of these incidents conflict with the prior information/assertions.

27/07/2021: ⬬ Rape of a Female Aged 16 and Over Arrest This custody record details the arrest of the victim as an alleged offender on allegations of having raped a female over the age of 16 on two separate occasions, referring to his ex-wife. The CAD record confirms this as a "Domestic Incident" and notes a "Harassment and Historic Rape" crime to follow, directly linking it to the ex-wife's spiteful report and arrest that day. It notes the Victim had already left in his "hard top Mercedes" when police arrived. The gentleman heard in the Dash Cam footage audio is Robert D Agostiniresident of 24 Shrub House Close. Describing the behaviour of the Victims then wife during the indicentof 20/03/2009 that catalysed the Victim's leaving the marital home permanently. It was Robert D Agostini's discription of my then wife manipulating the narrativeand foretelling of what happened during the following five years and one month until 14/04/2014.

Documents	Chronology
Custody: 27_07_2021_37BC-1858-21.pdf Appendix F Appendix N: Recall of the 22/07/2021 Arrest	Chronology: 20/03/2009

20/08/2021: ⬬ First Committal - Second Hearing G01NR161 Represented at the Second Hearing (collapsed) of First Committal by David Langwallner of 1MCB, HHJ North was given sight in chambers of the full email thread between ASB Officer Sharples to T/Sgt Benton and the contradictory "Appendix B" of the claimants committal bundle. The case fell apart.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Suffolk Law Centre 16-08-2021 David Langwallner.pdf Probative: Suffolk Law Lucy Davies.pdf Probative: Full Email Thread 5th - 15th January 2021.pdf Probative: Appendix B 20th August 2021.pdf	Chronology: 18/02/2021 Finding of Fact Hearing Chronology: 14/01/2021 False Paedophile Allegations Chronology: 14/10/2020 N205c Notice (Process Start) Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

25/09/2021: Unknown CAD entry Further investigation required to establish reason for this cad entry, no current recollection of events.
- Probative: 25-09-2021-cad-record — SC-25092021-177
19/10/2021: Formal Complaint to NSFT The Victim made a formal complaint to Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (NSFT) third-party inclusion into discussions concerning his care during the "Professionals Meeting" on 22/04/2021. This complaint highlighted the significant role of non-medical individuals (ASB Officer, police) in events leading to his 28-day section. This complaint and a subsequent complaint recommended by Voicability Advocate drew an identical response with denial that third parties were involved or potentially influenced Dr C Zapata during the Professionals meeting of 22/04/2021.
- Probative: PHSO Complaint Final/
- Probative: NSFT Response Email 18-11-2024- victim - Outlook.pdf
22-10-2021: Psychiatrist Attempts Damage Control CZ attempted to re-engage with the Victim. Quote: "An appointment has been arranged for you to meet with DR Zapata and his colleague, Iona Williams..."
- Probative: Dr Zapata Attempts to re-engage 22-10-2021.pdf
02/11/2021: ✱ Instruction of Satchell Moran Solicitors In response to and following the committal process of Aug 2021 and continuing constabulary misconduct, Satchell Moran Solicitors were instructed under CFA to pursue a civil claim against the Chief Constable (Incident 27/09/2020). Their letter of retainer confirmed good prospects of success and engagement under a Conditional Fee Agreement. (Subsequent developments revealed their reliance on incomplete or distorted medical records, which impaired their ability to form a fully informed case assessment. (See: 02/06/2023)
- Probative: Satchell Moran Our Ref Mr Micheal Burdette-Deakin126189.00.pdf

06/12/2021: ⭾ ⬬ HMRC Demand (Tax Credit Overpayment £69.76)HMRC issue demand for repayment of £69.76 alleged “tax credit overpayment” (Ref: WL156455A). Overpayment relates to period after 19/03/2009 bail conditions (exclusion from family home) and 20/03/2009 single claimant DWP application (crisis loan). Original tax credit payments were made into ex-wife’s account, not mine DWP repeatedly reversed HMRC deductions (4 occasions between 2009–2021) confirming liability was not mine.Despite this, HMRC continued to pursue me personally, reflecting systemic contamination of records by ex-wife’s misrepresentations. This is the third recurrence since 2009, always the same pattern: HMRC issues an “overpayment” demand (typically prompted by my ex-wife). DWP subsequently audits, confirms I was not liable (since my arrest/removal on 19/03/2009 and re-application on 22/03/2009), and refunds the sum.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: 6th December 2021 HMRC Tax Credits.pdf The HMRC/DWP paper trail is not about institutional error but about the victims ex-wife's persistence in deceit. Appendix F	Chronology: 27/07/2021 Rape of a Female Chronology: 20/03/2009 Marital Breakdown Recrimination Chronology: 04/11/2005 High-Gravity Safeguarding Record

19/12/2021: Non-Crime Harassment Investigation This report documents the Victim's allegations of being followed by two different vehicles while driving, which was investigated as a non-crime harassment incident.
- Crime: 19_12_2021_37-72745-21.pdf
- CAD: SC-21122021-138 (21/12/2021)
- Note: The CAD record contains a lengthy and detailed account of the events, including the "blacked-out van" and your use of military intelligence "tricks," which PC 806 SAMPHER's subsequent log dismisses as a "symptom of his ongoing mental health issues" and a "coincidence." This is a prime example of an officer using subjective, non-medical assessments to invalidate your legitimate concerns, highlighting a clear bias.
2022
11/01/2022: Harassment Allegation (Civil Papers) The Victim received a new set of civil papers and filed a report of harassment with the police, multiple emails detailing the process defect in N16A, N205c and its mandatory accompanying letter asserting prior hearing and indicating continuing malicious fabrications.
- CAD: SC-11012022-259 (11/01/2022)
- Note: The CAD record confirms the Victim's online report, which cites the civil papers as the source of harassment and notes the motivation as "Conscience of guilt" from the offender. Police dismiss this with "NOTHING TO RECORD-CAN BE CLOSED."
18/01/2022: ⬬ Indecent Assault on Female Arrest This custody record details the arrest of victim on suspicion of indecent assault on a female under 14, stemming from a historic allegation allegedly by his daughter.
- Custody: 18_01_2022_37BC-168-22.pdf

06/04/2022: IOPC Complaint Submission - Sharples-Benton Data Breach

Documents	Chronology
Probative: IOPC submission-622408-115903 06-04-2022.pdf CAD: SC-26022022-16 (26/02/2022) Note: Cross-agency contamination identified in 2022 complaint. PSD closed as "landlord issue" despite police conduct implications. New evidence (EEAS 01/07/2025, HNK 02/06/2025) discovered three years later proves systemic fraud. PSD refuses to distinguish new evidence from closed complaint.	Chronology: 14/01/2021 False Paedophile Allegations Chronology: 05/01/2021 Single Charge Dismissed Chronology: 23/12/2020 CPS No Emails Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report

22/04/2022: ⬬ NSFT Denial of Responsibility NSFT NHS responded to the Victim's complaint dated 19/10/2021. Quote: "Investigation Report and Findings: Please let me reassure you that, whilst we acknowledge the perceptions of those organisations who share information with us, including the police, we do not make evidence-based decisions based on third party information. Our information and outcomes are based on the interactions and assessment that takes place through our own interactions with individuals and how they share their life stories." Unquote

Documents	Chronology
Probative: 22 April 2022 NSFT Initial Complaint Decision.pdf Appendix B	Chronology: 22/04/2021 Third Party MH Interference

Note: Assessment of NSFT Response. This response contradicted documented events of the 22/04/2021 "Professionals Meeting" and subsequent sectioning. The presence of the ASB Officer and police, and CZ's speculative statements, strongly suggested third-party information played a crucial role. This denial undermined NSFT's investigation and strengthened the Victim's position regarding his detention and resulting personal injury from inappropriate medical interventions.

29/04/2022: Eviction Process Started Notice of intent to seek possession was served. This action occurred during the government's pandemic-related eviction restrictions, which generally allowed evictions only under extreme circumstances, suggesting an escalated aggressive and potentially manipulative use of process by the ASB Officer.
- Probative: Notice of Intent to Seek Possession Letter 29-04-2022.pdf
18/06/2022: LiP Email to Birketts-Flagship Legal
- Probative: 18-06-2022.pdf
04/07/2022: Housing Ombudsman Email: Contact with Housing Ombudsman related to issues with ASB Officer Sharples essentially stalled. The vitims complaints to Flagship Housing were resonded to stating that complaints by default are referred to the Anti-Social Behaviour Team, the complaint in this instance directly related to the ASB Officer and were forwarded directly to the victim's abuser. No requests to redirect complaints to alternate staff were resaponded to. No communications were available to send to Ombudsman and that referral was closed.
- Probative: 4th July 2022 Housing Ombudsman 202128431.pdf
23/07/2022: ⬬ Suicide Threats and Harassment Allegations The Victim telephoned the police after a letter from them had caused him "alarm and distress". The Victim became agitated and threatened to hang himself if put in prison.
- Probative: 23-07-2022.pdf LiP Email to Birketts-Flagship Legal
- CAD: SC-23072022-99 (23/07/2022)
- Note: The CAD record confirms the Victim's suicide threats and his statements that he made them "to ensure police take his allegations more seriously," which police internally dismissed as "unlikely" validating the victims concerns, the CAD record also notes his complaints about a lack of help from police, courts, and Flagship.
26/07/2022: LiP Emails to Birketts-Flagship Legal
- Probative: 26-07-2022.pdf
- Probative: 26-07-2022-1.pdf
- Probative: 26-07-2022-2.pdf
- Probative: 26-07-2022-3.pdf
- Probative: 26-07-2022-4.pdf
- Probative: 26-07-2022-5.pdf

28/07/2022: ⬬ First Londis Incident The Victim attempted to buy electricity credit with cash at a convenience store. The vendor unlawfully attempted a £0.50 surcharge; the Victim declined and left. Several hours later, the police arrived at the Victim's home, and the details regarding the arrest are further expanded in >Appendix M: Detailed Recall of the 28/07/2022 First Londis Incident and Arrest. The Victim was arrested on suspicion of theft. The custody officer asked if the Victim wanted anyone informed; the Victim firmly stated "No, nobody. This is a private matter." The Victim was released after interview under investigation. The arrest suggested an unnecessary and potentially unjust police intervention given evidence of a cash transaction attempt (see: Appendix B). This was part of a pattern of unnecessary and harassing police intervention that inflicted significant emotional distress, public humiliation, and exacerbated feelings of persecution. (See: Appendix E.3 for further assessment.)

Documents	Chronology
Probative: londis-continuum-in-brief.pdf Probative: Legal Counsel 28.07.2022 - 37BC.2162.22_0001.pdf CAD: SC-28072022-276 (28/07/2022) Appendix B Appendix D Appendix E.2 Appendix E.3 Appendix M	Chronology: 03/09/2022 PC FEENEY Unlawful Cannabis Arrest Chronology: 01/08/2022 Data Protection Breach T/Sgt 1845 BENTON Chronology: 28/07/2022 Kitchen Incident (Prescription Confirmed by Multiple Officers)

Note: The CAD record explicitly links the arrest for theft to this incident, confirming the police's immediate action was based on the vendor's report of a financial dispute. This is the first of two arrests related to this ongoing issue. Notably this record does not list "Resources" (list of officers attending) as in many other CAD Records further pointing to incredibly poor record keeping. This incident's details were later improperly disclosed by T/Sgt 1845 BENTON to the ASB Officer, and subsequently included in Nick Bunn's sworn statement, demonstratinga police breach of confidentiality and misuse of private information as part of the ongoing malicious campaign.

Matrix: C-04 C-06 C-07

29/07/2022: ◆ DATA Breaches - Custody & NSFT

29/07/2022

⭾ + ⬬ Londis 1st Incident: 29/07/2022 Custody Data Breach: T/Sgt 1845 BENTON, K This crime/custody report details an incident at Londis Village Store where the Victim was accused of leaving the shop without paying for an electricity top-up after refusing a 50p service charge. This custody record details allegedly topping up an electric card and leaving a shop without paying, and for calling a neighbor a "Cunt," an alleged Public Order Act offense. Second Independent Clinical Stabilisation under a three-clinician MHA assessment confirms the same conclusion reached during the rapid-release review a year earlier: stable, no disorder. Concluded no mental disorder, not detainable, no need for admission, no grounds under MHA.

Documents	Chronology
Crime: 29_07_2022_37-48274-22.pdf Custody: 29_07_2022_37BC-2162-22.pdf RUI: Release without Bail RUI 29.07.2022 - 37BC.2162.22.pdf CAD: SC-29072022-113 (29/07/2022)	Chronology: 03/06/2021 MHA2 28-Day Section Revoked

29/07/2022

⭾ + ⤤ NSFT Data Breach: 29/07/2022 POST CUSTODY: Vicki Catchpole, a Liaison & Diversion Practitioner from Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (NSFT), sent an email to Nick Bunn (Flagship Group) under the subject 'confidential'. In this email, Ms. Catchpole explicitly informed Mr. Bunn that a formal mental health act assessment had been requested for the victim, which would be completed while he was in custody. This disclosure of victim's custody status and mental health assessment details by an NHS professional to a housing association employee, without consent, constitutes a clear and actionable breach of confidentiality and data protection by NSFT. This information was subsequently used against victim in civil proceedings.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Vicky Catchpole Data Breach 29-07-2022.pdf Probative: Nick Bunn Statement 19th August 2022.pdf Probative: 29-07-2022.pdf LiP Email to Birketts-Flagship Legal	Chronology: 22/04/2021 Professionals' Meeting (Established Data Sharing Pattern) Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report (False Narrative Origin) Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

Further Impact: This information was later detailed in Nick Bunn's sworn statement (18/08/2022), demonstrating how improperly obtained confidential data was leveraged in civil proceedings.
Note: This breach occurred despite victim's explicit instruction to the police (following his arrest on 28/07/2022) that no one was to be informed of his custody. This suggests the police informed Ms. Catchpole against his wishes, likely under the guise of mental health concerns, thereby facilitating this breach.

01/08/2022: ⭾ ⬬ Data Protection Breach T/Sgt 1845 BENTON ◆ The Victim, reviewing the second committal bundle, discovered in a sworn statement of the ASB Officer's manager, details of the 28/07/2022 arrest (third-hand) as "committed theft from a local business contrary to tenancy agreement." This information was given by the ASB Officer (who received it from T/Sgt 1845 BENTON), despite the Victim's explicit request to police not to inform anyone. This constituted a clear police breach of confidentiality and misuse of private information for further assessment)

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Sgt 1845 Benton Data Breach 01-08-2022.pdf Probative: Nick Bunn Statement 19th August 2022.pdf Appendix B Appendix D Appendix E.2 Appendix E.3	Chronology: 28/07/2022 Arrest (Data Then Disclosed) Chronology: 22/04/2021 Professionals' Meeting (Coordination Pattern) Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report (Start of ASB-Police Coordination) Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

Note: Role attribution conflict In NSFT minutes (22/04/2021) Bunn is recorded as “Manager, Flagship Housing”. In this sworn statement he describes himself as “Safe Communities Manager”.

02/08/2022: LiP Email to Birketts-Flagship Legal
- Probative: 02-08-2022.pdf
04/08/2022: ⭾ NSFT Data Breach (Vicki Catchpole Follow-up) ◆ Vicki Catchpole (NSFT) sent a follow-up email to Nick Bunn (Flagship Group), again under the subject 'RE: confidential'. In this communication, Ms. Catchpole provided further confidential details, explicitly stating that victim 'was not detained' and 'was offered a re-referral into Bury North IDT mental health community team but he declined. No follow ups were recommended.' This continued disclosure of sensitive mental health information by an NHS professional to a housing association employee, without consent, constitutes a further breach of confidentiality and data protection by NSFT.
- Probative: Vicky Catchpole Data Breach 04-08-2022.pdf
- Note: This email provides further details of victim's mental health assessment outcome and his decision to decline services, information that remained confidential and was not for disclosure to a third party like Flagship. This continues the pattern of unauthorized information sharing. Further Impact: This information was also later detailed in Nick Bunn's sworn statement (18/08/2022).

08/08/2022: ⭾ ⬬ ◆ DOMAIN BLOCKED Hosting provider suspends parrotwisdom.co.uk, reason cited: "suspected fraud" (archival reference: Wayback Machine capture 22 January 2022). This action occurred after the Victim had published documentary material exposing the actual fraud: the N16A General Form of Application for Injunction (dated 09/10/2020, containing a false statutory declaration relating to 29/09/2020) and the N205C Notice of Issue confirming no civil process in respect of GO1NR161 was in force until 14/10/2020. These documents proved ASB Officer Sharples provided false information to police, resulting in unlawful arrest (27/09/2020). The domain suspension functioned as retaliation: the website exposing fraud was itself reported as fraudulent, inverting victim and offender.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: domain-suspension-forensic-reconstruction.pdf Probative: DOMAIN BLOCKED Probative: what-the-manifest-HOST-represents.pdf Probative: Parrot Wisdom Manifest 08/08/2022 📂 (SHELL) Probative: facebook-mpeafree Archived Facebook Profile Details (Shell)	Chronology: 02/08/2012 Malicious Website Referrals and Domain Disruption Chronology: 29/09/2004 First Publications - Self Hosted/Public Domain

Notes: Facebook Account for 'mpeafree', active since 2001 detailing the entire provenance and evolution of the public domain, after considerable deliberation was deactivated in 2023. However the victim took the precaution of downloading the entire account data which is available on request. (Compressed size: ~602MB)
02/08/2012 – Provenance: Internet Archive capture of www.parrotwisdom.co.uk confirms Victim’s authorship of structured HTML content (Parrot Wisdom project). Demonstrates technical competence and continuity of practice, predating present disputes
Impact / DARVO Inversion: The suspension removed public access to the Victim's long-established online material (2004–2021) at the exact moment documentary evidence exposing civil fraud was being published. The legitimate website was maliciously reported as "fraudulent" by those committing the actual fraud (Sharples/Flagship civil process manipulation). By blocking the website when N16A/N205C discrepancies were publicly accessible, the action suppressed material directly contradicting official narratives. The removal inhibited lawful expression concerning matters of public interest and demonstrates the suspension functioned to preserve the fraudulent narrative rather than address any legitimate allegation.

Matrix: C-02 C-06 C-08 C-09 C-14 Derivative: C-15 C-16 C-17 C-19

19/08/2022: ⭾ ⬬ ◆ Judicial Recognition of Legal Aid Obstruction During the first day of the second committal attempt, before HHJ Pigram, the Victim appeared unrepresented, having been unable to retain counsel. The Victim raised difficulties in securing legal representation, including issues arising from the earlier N16A statutory declaration, which had framed the proceedings in a manner excluding access to Legal Aid. HHJ Pigram acknowledged these difficulties and, from the bench, produced a written letter expressly directing that legal representation be obtained at public expense, advising the Victim to present the letter for that purpose.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Order of Court 19th August 2022.pdf Probative: Nick Bunn Statement 19th August 2022.pdf Probative: G01NR161 Flagship v Burdette-Deakin - 19 August 2022.PDF	Chronology: 20/08/2021 First Committal Chronology: 18/02/2021 Finding of Fact Hearing Chronology: 14/01/2021 False Paedophile Allegations Chronology: 14/10/2020 N205c Notice (Process Start - Fraud Proof) Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest (Temporal Fraud) Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

24/08/2022: ⬬ Disclosure of Appendix B Versions / Fifth Affidavit This notice from ASB/Flagship external legal indicates various serious issues with both committal filings. The substitution of Appendix B, the existence of a prior (defective) Appendix B, the silent rewriting between 2021 → 2022, ASB Officer Sharples’ Fifth Affidavit, the meta-narrative change, the abandonment of the fabricated social-media allegations. The Committal Statements Analysis compares both filings side by side.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Birketts Notice.pdf Probative: committal-statements-analysis.pdf	Chronology: 21/06/2021 First Committal Bundle Served

03/09/2022: ⬬ Londis Second Incident The Victim, driving past the convenience store, stopped for traffic, and was approached by the vendor demanding electricity payment. This led to a second arrest related to the matter. The Victim was booked, interviewed, and released. PC 37 1654 FEENEY arrived, arrested the Victim for alleged breach of peace and possession of cannabis she knew was prescribed, indicating an abuse of power and disregard for medical legitimacy.

Documents

Chronology

Probative: Dr Sunny Nayee Prescription Letter.pdf
Probative: full-londis-sequence-forensic-breakdown.pdf
Probative: PC 37 1654 FEENEY.pdf
Probative: Arrest Drug Panel 29 July 2022 13.00.pdf
Probative: 37BC-2569-22 PC 37 1654 FEENEY.pdf
Probative: Sainsburys Receipt 3rd September 2022.pdf
Probative: Combined Statement Theft-Public order x 2.pdf
Crime: 03_09_2022_37-56906-22.pdf
Crime: 03_09_2022_37-56911-22.pdf
Custody: 03_09_2022_37BC-2569-22.pdf
CAD: SC-03092022-264 (03/09/2022)

Appendix B
Chronology: 27/09/2020 Pattern - Arrest Ignoring Evidence
Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report (Establishes False Narrative)
Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

37-56906-22: Harassment, Alarm, or Distress This crime report details an incident at Londis Village Store, where the Victim was accused of causing intentional harassment, alarm, or distress by verbal abuse.
37-56911-22: Possession of Class B - Cannabis ◆ This crime report details the arrest of victim for possession of herbal cannabis at Londis Village Store. The case was finalized with no formal action taken against the offender, as it was deemed not in the public interest due to the small amount of cannabis and the suspect already serving a prison sentence for other matters.
37-56911-22: ⬬ Private Medication Seized PC 37 1654 Feeney's report of cannabis possession at the convenience store, despite general station knowledge of the Victim's licensed prescription, indicated a failure to act lawfully and an abuse of discretion this information is also linked to Chronology Entry 12/08/2020 and Crime Report 37/56911/22 Theft by Vendor by False Representation (Fraud)
37BC-2569-22: Public Order Act and Drugs Possession Arrest This custody record details the arrest of victim for Public Order Act - Sec 4 (Fear/Provocation of Violence) and Drugs - Possess Class B or C, stemming from an incident at Londis Village Store where he was allegedly swearing at staff and an elderly gentleman.
Victim Rebuttal: The Victim's version is largely supported by dash cam footage showing a trip to Sainsburys, in preference to the store that persistently overcharged for free services, with documentation from both the Victims bank account and E.on the electricity supplier (who opened their own investigation). The narrative differs significantly from PC 37 1654 FEENEY.

Matrix: C-04 C-06

30/09/2022: Vehicle Damage Assessment This invoice details the damage resulting from persistently ignored requests not to squeeze a vehicle into what is obviouly not a suitable parking location.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: 31-05-2022 Seriously, It takes a crash to convince you.mp4 Probative: Dawn Mackinder offers appology for £1400 in damage.pdf Probative: D12 VJD Damage Assessment Invoice AU424582.pdf Probative: D12 VJD Damage - Dawn Mckinder Liability Accepted.pdf	Chronology: 26/07/2021 Hate Speech against the Victim

October 2022: Responding to Bail Londis IncidentsOn answering bail for the two incidents of 28/07/2022 and 03/09/2022 the Victim produced an electricity account management page with two cash transactions, and a bank statement for 01/07/2022 to 01/08/2022 showing no electronic transaction between 24/07/2022 and 06/08/2022, substantiating the cash attempt. An email from PayPoint services was also provided, advising an internal investigation had been opened into policy violations, leading to the vendor losing his PayPoint franchise.
- Probative: Bank Statement.pdf
- Probative: Paypoint Investigation 26-09-2022.pdf
- Probative: E.on Next Account management Smart PAY Payments.pdf

10/10/2022: ✱ ◆ Legal Aid Refused - Mental Health Self Referral

10/10/2022
Legal Aid Refused ✱ Despite Judicial Direction Despite the Order of Court dated 19/08/2022, Legal Aid was formally refused. The refusal directly negated the judicial instruction that representation be obtained at public expense, leaving the Victim unrepresented in ongoing committal proceedings.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Legal aid not approved 10.10.2022.pdf	Chronology: 04/11/2020 Temporal Impossibility

10/10/2022
Mental Health Self Referral ◆ The Victim self-referred to mental health, barely cognitive and incoherent, as a direct result of the denial of legal aid on 10/10/2022, which followed the ineffectiveness of the Order of Court 19th August 2022. A close friend had taken the victim to A&E concerned that the victim had begun to 'shut down' cognitively, aware of the victims ongoing situation. A&E recognised a mental health crisis and admitted him as a self-referral, placing him in a trauma cubicle for 28 ~ 30 hours while a ward is found (pending renewed FOI from NHS) it was during this period the victim witnessed in real time a shift in 'atmosphere' regarding his presence for which the explanation arrived shortly thereafter. The Victim was transported 30 miles to a secure assessment unit, still as a voluntary admission. However, somewhere between West Suffolk A&E Bury St Edmunds and intake at Poppy Ward, Ipswich the victim was reclassified from 'self referral' to 'police detainee' and subjected to a 'different' experience altogether.
CAD: SC-06082022-113 (06/08/2022)
Notes: The CAD record for an earlier "Concern for Safety" report notes that the Victim admitted to threatening suicide "to ensure police take his allegations more seriously." Police internally dismissed this as a tactic, further demonstrating their bias and pathologizing of his legitimate concerns.

11/10/2022: 72hr MHA2 Section The Victim experienced a breakdown and was placed on a 72-hour involuntary hold for in-depth assessment.

13/10/2022: ⬬ Judgement in Absence of HHJ Pigram While subject to the 72-hour 'hold' ordered by NSFT NHS Mental Health Services (Poppy Ward), the 13/10/2022 hearing for Committal to Prison for Contempt of Civil Injunction (potentially unlawful) proceeded, sentencing the Victim to a term of imprisonment. 25 Emails alleged, found (auditable) Nine. The Judgement handed down indicates 25 emails, conflicting with both Hospital Records and in point of fact the emails were an attempt by the victim as LiP to raise awareness of a document defect having been forced to represent himself with the denial of Legal Aid on N16A General Form of Application for Injunction: Statutory Declaration that frames the matter as ASB/Property neglecting the facts surrounding the incident involving Suffolk Constabulary on 27/09/2020. HHJ Pigram was then aware of the difficulties in obtaining representation but was unaware his order of 19th August 2022 had been flatly rejected.

Documents

Chronology

Judgement: HHJ Pigram - Committal to Prison.pdf
Probative: Actual Emails sent to Counsel as LiP
Probative: Legal Aid not Approved.pdf
Probative: N16A General Form of Application for Injunction: Statutory Declaration

Chronology: 19/08/2022 Second Committal - Legal Aid Obstruction
Chronology: 18/02/2021 Finding of Fact Hearing
Chronology: 14/01/2021 False Paedophile Allegations
Chronology: 14/10/2020 N205c Notice (Process Start)
Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest
Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report
Chronology: 30/08/2018 The Suppression Letter (The Seed)
Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

Context ~ Duty of Accuracy: The victim’s persistent efforts to raise the procedural defect arose from a long-established personal and professional duty to ensure accuracy in official matters. These communications were made in good faith to prevent the defect from propagating, rather than from any misconception attributable to unrepresented status. (Throughout this entire continuum, I repeatedly reminded myself that if I did not act with honour, I would become what harmed me. Ultimately my mental state deteriorated beyond that before this hearing. see Chronology 10/10/2022)

Matrix: C-11

14/10/2022: 72hr MHA2 Hold Released The Victim was released from the 72-hour hold but was requested not to leave for two days.

18/10/2022: Arrest and Imprisonment Immediately after voluntarily checking out from a mental health facility, and despite demonstrating intent to leave, the Victim was subjected to an abrupt and traumatic arrest by police, handcuffed, and transported to prison. This unjust incarceration for seven and a half months, resulting from an injunction rooted in a falsely filed civil process and a "sentence in his absence," constituted a profound human rights violation and extreme personal injury. Awaiting disclosure from Norfok Constabulary and NSFT Mental Health.

Documents

Chronology

Custody Record 37MA/3894/22 (Prison Recall Arrest) This custody record details the arrest of victim for recall to prison/revocation of prison license. He was arrested at Woodlands and transferred to HMP.
Custody: 18_10_2022_37MA-3894-22.pdf
see Appendix B

Chronology: 13/10/2022 Judgement in Absence
Chronology: 19/08/2022 Second Committal - Legal Aid Obstruction
Chronology: 18/02/2021 Finding of Fact Hearing
Chronology: 14/01/2021 False Paedophile Allegations
Chronology: 14/10/2020 N205c Notice (Process Start)
Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest
Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report
Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

Matrix: C-04 C-07 C-14

16/11/2022: ✱ ◈ ⤤ ⭾ Dr J Singh Report Dr J Singh, under instruction with Satchell Moran Solicitors (27/09/2020) as an expert, issued a psychiatric report that mischaracterised the Victim’s presentation. Rather than independent analysis, the report recycled distortions already embedded in GP and hospital records — records corrupted by the ASB Officer’s defamatory narrative. By adopting those tainted accounts as fact, Singh amplified systemic bias and entrenched a false clinical picture, undermining the evidential foundation of civil claims.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Dr J Singh report for SM Solicitors 16-11-2022 Probative: Particulars of Claim (Satchell Moran) Probative: 05/12/2022 — Singh Report Dispute CAD: SC-13082018-247 Appendix: R	Chronology: 22/04/2021 Professionals' Meeting (Data Coordination) Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report (False Narrative Seed) Chronology: 13/08/2018 Falsified Criminal Damage Entry Chronology: 17/07/2018 Actual Assault (Overwritten in Records) Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

Note: Singh’s significance lies in legitimising the tainted material as “expert evidence,” not in originating it.
Caution: ⤤ Recycling note: This report recycles pre-existing false records. It is not the first injection point — See 17/07/2018 & EEAS disclosure re: Falsified CAD Entry.

2023

25/05/2023: Released from Custody The Victim spent seven and a half months incarcerated with no release date despite repeated enquiries with prison staff. Eventually on 24th January 2023 route to obtain a release date was identified yet this still took a further two weeks. Victim was released on this date, homeless, with no possessions except what he was released with and his parrot, cat and car that had been left with the friend who accompanied the Victim to A&E on 10/10/2022.

Documents

Chronology

Probative: No Release Date HMP Application.pdf

Chronology: 18/10/2022 Arrest and Imprisonment (Start of 7.5 months)
Chronology: 13/10/2022 Judgement in Absence
Chronology: 19/08/2022 Second Committal
Chronology: 18/02/2021 Finding of Fact
Chronology: 14/10/2020 N205c Notice (Fraudulent Process)
Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest
Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report
Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

26/05/2023: Homeless The Victim spent the next 10 months sofa surfing, unable to access documents except briefly.
30/05/2023: New GP Registration The Victim registered with a new GP in Mildehall and requested a Patient Summary Record for Universal Credit claim.
- Probative: Patient Summary Record.pdf

02/06/2023: ◈ ⬬ Termination of Satchell Moran Instruction Following disputes over medical evidence and pleadings, Satchell Moran confirmed the instruction would end unless the Singh report was accepted. This marked the conclusion of their engagement. Satchell Moran Solicitors terminated instruction after insisting the Singh report be accepted. Their withdrawal, despite clear evidence that the report was built on contaminated records, demonstrates how systemic bias in official documentation directly obstructed access to justice and sustained the underlying civil fraud on the court.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Particulars of Claim (Satchell Moran).pdf Probative: 24/03/2023 — Draft PoC Probative: 28/03/2023 — Follow-up on PoC Probative: 06/04/2023 — Wording & Expert Options Probative: 12/04/2023 — Closure Options Probative: Satchell Moran Confirmation Casefile closed	Chronology: 22/04/2021): Unconsented MH Hearing, Collaborative Strategical Planning

22/08/2023: ⬬ Tom Crabb Demand for Payment The Victim received an email demanding unpaid rent, three days later received a similar communication from West Suffolk County Council (WSCC) Housing Benefit office demanding return of overpaid rent benefit. I pointed out to WSCC the facts of the Judgement 13/10/2022 and have not heard from either party since.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Tom Crabb Demand For Payment.pdf Probative: Email to Anglia Revenues 17-11-2023.pdf Probative: Flagship Rent 00082886_01_Statement.pdf	Chronology: 18/10/2022 Void Arrest/Process Chronology: 06/11/2020 BT MEET ME Continuance GO1NR161

2024

07/03/2024: ⬬ Housing Application Rejected Consequence of Malicious Reference The Victim's application for housing with Clarion Housing Group was formally rejected. This rejection followed Clarion's standard procedure of contacting the previous landlord, Flagship Housing Group (where Mr. P. Sharples holds a key position), for a reference. The rejection explicitly cited the injunction, possession order, and allegations of 'serious anti-social behaviour including harassment, intimidation or domestic violence and/or criminal or immoral behaviour while a tenant with your previous landlord' (Flagship Housing Group) within the past 5 years. This document provides undeniable, third-party evidence that the malicious reference provided by Flagship, acting on behalf of the fraudulent civil process and subsequent unlawful incarceration, directly resulted in the Victim being denied housing and experiencing prolonged homelessness. This confirms the severe and lasting reputational damage and the profound personal injury inflicted by the 'molested reality'.

Documents

Chronology

Probative: Clarion Response.pdf
Note This rejection occurred during the 10-month period (May 2023 - March 2024) when the Victim was sofa surfing and experiencing homelessness following release from unlawful incarceration.

Chronology: 18/10/2022 Arrest and Imprisonment (7.5 months)
Chronology: 19/08/2022 Second Committal - Legal Aid Obstruction
Chronology: 18/02/2021 Finding of Fact Hearing
Chronology: 14/01/2021 False Paedophile Allegations
Chronology: 14/10/2020 N205c Notice (Process Start)
Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest
Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report
Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

14/03/2024: Ongoing Indifference from Authorities Continued misrouting and misclassification of the victims status as unlawfully made homeless gives a clear indication that remaining in West Suffolk would mean extended homelessness, discrimination and bias generated by the embedded false narrative and the victim determined the only thing to do was leave.
- Probative: west-suffolk-housing-response.pdf

18/03/2024: Relocation to Crawley West Sussex Still homeless, now living in his car the victim makes contact with local services and authorities.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: 19-03-2024-kris-moorey-cbc-homeless-referral.pdf Probative: 20-03-2024-crawley-open-house.pdf	Chronology: 07/03/2024 Housing Rejected (Forced Relocation) Chronology: 25/05/2023 Released Homeless Chronology: 18/10/2022 Imprisonment (Lost Possessions/Housing) Chronology: 14/10/2020 N205c Notice (Fraudulent Process) Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

12/04/2024: SUSSEX POLICE CONTACT Investigator Laura Ireland (39930) emails to finalize an official statement regarding the "Stuart" assault. Status: Documented Victim.
- Probative: LauraIreland-investigator-12-04-2024.pdf
- Probative: response to laura ireland-12-04-2024.pdf
- Probative: BURDETTE-DEAKIN Statement.pdf

14/04/2024: Private Landlord Engagement - Traffic Stop

14/04/2024: Private Landlord Engagement With advice from Kris Moorey at Crawly Borough Council the victim makes contact with a number of local private renatl landlords but stumbles financially with local authorities unaware of the full circumstnaces of the victims forced homelessness and lack of physical documentation.
Probative: 27-03-2024-contact-with-private-landlord.pdf

14/04/2024: ⭾ Traffic Stop Victim was stopped by EA828 HUNT, Lee. Unsure why the stop occurred but it is reasonable to presume it was his support companion avian sitting on his shoulder. No TOR since once stopped and asked if the bird could be secured the victim did so securing his companion in her travel cage on the passenger seat, Officer Hunt was advised of prescription status but this fell on 'deaf ears'. Victim was transported to Brighton PIC, interviewed, blood samples taken and released. An interaction between two officers during release process came to the attention of the victim but he remained silent. Quote: "Well, he's our problem now"

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Lee-Hunt-EA828.pdf Probative: mislaid-driving-licence.pdf Probative: Why a Parrot.pdf	Chronology: 19/05/2005: Tainted Records Referenced

22/04/2024: HNK Solicitor confirms contact with KC Michelle McMahon confirms HNK solicitors re-engagement with Mr Murray KC, the same engaged by Satchell Moran. See Satchell Moran professional abdication.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: 22-04-2024-Michelle_McMahon.pdf Probative: 22-04-2024-disclosure-receipt-request.pdf Probative: 22-04-2024-Michelle_McMahon.pdf	Chronology: 16/11/2022 Tainted Records Enter Civil Claims Domain

2025
03/02/2025: ◈ Higgs Newton Kenyon Engagement The Victim receives initial confirmation of receipt of files by Higgs Newton Kenyon from Satchell Moran. On 03/02/2025 HNK confirmed receipt of the case materials previously held by Satchell Moran, revealing the full extent of contamination in the inherited file. The summary provided by HNK showed that Satchell Moran had accepted the police narrative at face value, treating allegations of harassment, distress to neighbours, and “reasonable suspicion” as established facts without verification. The material contained no recognition of wider context, no analysis of underlying errors, and no acknowledgement of misclassification or procedural irregularities. Satchell Moran had framed the matter solely as a routine police-action tort and omitted the broader evidential background, passing HNK an incomplete, narrative-driven file built on police assumptions. This document demonstrates how HNK entered the case with a skewed understanding, explaining their later refusal to consider issues outside the narrow CFA-based claims and their misclassification of the wider matter. It also shows the point at which solicitor-side contamination first entered the legal chain.
- Probative: HNK Files Received 03-02-2025.pdf

24/02/2025: CPS Discontinuance - Drug Driving Charge (14/04/2024 Arrest) CPS formally discontinued proceedings for "driving with excess of drugs in system" (Ref: 47CC1071224/HM) arising from 14/04/2024 traffic stop by EA828 HUNT (Sussex Police). Decision based on insufficient evidence for realistic prospect of conviction. This discontinuance confirms prescription cannabis was lawful medication, yet cross-county markers from Suffolk Constabulary contamination resulted in unlawful arrest despite victim's prescription status being disclosed at scene. Officer EA828 HUNT's comment during release ("Well, he's our problem now") evidences inter-force intelligence sharing treating victim as "problem subject" based on Suffolk's contaminated records. Legal aid covered defense costs in full.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: 20250224160543.pdf (Geoff White Solicitors notification) Probative: 20250224160557.pdf (CPS Notice of Discontinuance)	Chronology: 14/04/2024 Traffic Stop (Cross-County Markers) Chronology: 28/07/2022 Kitchen Incident (Prescription Confirmed by Multiple Officers) Chronology: 03/09/2022 PC FEENEY Unlawful Cannabis Arrest

Note: This represents a second unlawful arrest for lawful prescription cannabis (03/09/2022, 14/04/2024), demonstrating contaminated markers persisting across county boundaries despite repeated confirmation of prescription status. Sussex Police acted on Suffolk intelligence without independent verification, continuing pattern of persecution via inter-force data sharing.

31/03/2025: ◈ ⬬ HNK Reference: MM2/147080 - Particulars of Claim ~ George Murray KC The Victim receieves communication from Higgs Netwon Kenyon. This second PoC proves that the contaminated psychiatric narrative created by the fraud chain was later abandoned once the institutional record-poisoning was exposed.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: HNK-ref-MM2-147080-31-03-2025.pdf Probative: HNK-126189.001-particulars-of-claim.pdf	Chronology: 02/06/2023): Satchell Moran Solicitors Professional Abdication

31/05/2025: Beginning of Discovery The Victim was rehoused and began to review documentation safely stored on a memory stick and backed up at various international data storage locations.

02/06/2025: ✱ ◈ ⬬ HNK Settlement: Unlawful Arrest (27/09/2020) Higgs Newton Kenyon confirmed settlement of £4,400 in respect of the unlawful arrest and trespass arising from the 27/09/2020 incident initiated by ASB Officer P. Sharples. The settlement constitutes formal acknowledgement by the Defendant of wrongdoing by state agents acting upon a misrepresentation from a private landlord source. This outcome converts the established Pattern of Concern into a concluded tortious act.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: HNK Settlement Ref MM2147080.pdf Chronology: 27/09/2020: Unlawful Arrest (Concluded Tortious Act)	Chronology: 14/10/2020 N205c Notice (Proves Temporal Fraud) Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Origin)

07/06/2025: Ongoing (Higgs Newton Kenyon) Multiple civil processes are ongoing toward police, with civil action toward police relative to the 27/09/2020 arrest settlement agreed. Additional Civil cases are ongoing with Suffolk Constabulary (Files 157123, 157121, 157119, 157118, 157114, 157120). Referrals are ongoing to the Parliamentary Health Services Ombudsman (PHSO), Norfolk Policing Standards Department (IOPC Referral), and Legal Ombudsman (LeO Ref: F194151).
30/06/2025: ✱ EEAS FOI Disclosures Victim recieves East of England Ambulance Service (EEAS) disclosures in email via Freedom of Information Request (FIO) and discovers the forensic anomalies between these records and official disclosures of Suffolk Constabulary.
- Probative: CAD-1707181476-WRS.pdf

11/07/2025: ⬬ Correspondence from Higgs Newton Keyon After the victim again attempted raising concerns regarding underlying fraud mere weeks prior to EEAS disclosure confirming tainted records; firm incorrectly characterised the issue as a “criminal matter” and declined engagement, indicating they could not advise. Attached email shows misstatement and refusal despite clarification attempt.
Formal Complaint to HNK and IOPC Case Reopened (2025009880) The Victim issued an urgent written complaint to HNK (Michelle McMahon, Craig Newton, Vivien Lee) demanding a definitive strategy for all matters. The communication challenged HNK’s continued misclassification of the 13/10/2022 unlawful imprisonment as a “criminal matter,” despite multiple criminal solicitors confirming it was a civil fraud issue. The Victim highlighted two months of disjointed communication, dismissal of foundational civil-fraud evidence, and HNK’s unauthorised ATE/CFA actions taken contrary to explicit prior rejection. The complaint required HNK to state whether they intended to pursue the full fraud-continuum case—including overturning the 13/10/2022 judgment—or limit themselves to six isolated police-action claims.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: Oversight: Initial Complaint to HNK 11-07-2025.pdf Probative: HNK Mis-stating Criminal Matter.pdf HNK_03-02-2025_09102111.pdf	Chronology: 13/10/2022 Judgement In Absence Chronology: 13/08/2018 Criminal Damage Entry (Falsified) Chronology: 17/07/2018 Actual Assault (Overwritten)

Note: Embedded exhibit. HNK email dated 11/06/2025 classifying the issue as a criminal matter; relied upon in complaint/escalation dated 11/07/2025.
On the same date, the Victim received confirmation from the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) that his complaint had been revisited in light of new evidence and was now under review: Case Reference 2025009880.

12/07/2025: HNK Solicitors Acquisition Notice (Express Solicitors Limited) Higgs Newton Kenyon issued formal notice that the firm had been acquired by Express Solicitors Limited, assigning the existing retainer and transferring all rights, obligations, data, and case handling to the successor firm. The communication confirmed organisational instability during the period in which HNK had been slow to engage with the case (mid-2024 → mid-2025). This was the first indication to the Client of internal restructuring affecting progression of the claim.
- Probative: Express Solicitors Acquisition of HNK 11-07-2025.pdf
17/07/2025: ⬬ HNK Final Response to Complaint – Legal Ombudsman Referral (F194151)
- ⬬ HNK Final Response to Complaint – Refusal to Act on 13/10/2022 Committal: Higgs Newton Kenyon (Craig Newton, Partner) issued a formal final response to the Victim’s complaint of 11/07/2025. The firm confirmed that they would not act in relation to the 13/10/2022 committal, asserting that this decision was reasonable and justified and that their advice would not change, despite the Victim’s contention that the matter is a civil fraud based on contaminated records. HNK maintained that service to date had been reasonable, rejected allegations of bullying or misconduct, and warned that further “unfounded allegations” could lead to termination of all CFAs and the firm billing the Victim for work done on each ongoing claim. The firm confirmed that its strategy was limited to pursuing the existing actions-against-the-police claims, pending full responses from the defendant force, and invited the Victim either to continue on those terms or to terminate instructions (with costs consequences) or seek alternative solicitors.
- Probative: HNK Response to Complaint 17-07-2025.pdf
- 17/07/2025: Legal Ombudsman Referral (F194151) – Acknowledgement of Complaint Against HNK/Express. The Victim lodged a formal complaint with the Legal Ombudsman concerning the conduct of HNK/Express Solicitors, including non-engagement, misclassification of the civil-fraud foundation, and unauthorised CFA/ATE actions. The Legal Ombudsman confirmed receipt of the complaint and opened file reference F194151, advising that preliminary checks would be conducted to assess jurisdiction, completeness, and time limits. The referral forms part of the escalating oversight route pursued after successive failures by HNK to address the core issues of file contamination, procedural defect, and case misdirection.
- Oversight:LeO Referral F194151.pdf
- Oversight:Legal Ombudsman Referral.pdf
- Oversight:IOPC Acknowledgement.pdf

28/07/2025: PUBLIC DOMAIN RECOVERY Victim discovers parrotwisdom.co.uk is again available as a public domain and repurchases registration, subscription and hosting. 28/07/2025

Documents	Chronology
PUBLIC DOMAIN: www.parrotwisdom.co.uk	Chronology: 08/08/2022 Public Domain Suspension (Alleged Fraud) Chronology: 02/08/2012 Malicious Website Referrals and Domain Disruption Chronology: 29/09/2004 First Publications - Self Hosted/Public Domain

19/08/2025: Higgs Newton Kenyon ATE Client requested option to pay ATE insurance premium upfront as a cost-limiting measure; request was rejected by Hannah McGarvey, who confirmed the firm would not allow client-funded premium payment and maintained their internal policy position.
- Probative: Hannah McGarvey response 19-08-2025.pdf

20/08/2025: ⬬ HMRC Child Tax Credits This is not an isolated administrative glitch. It is the fourth recurrence since 2009, always the same pattern: HMRC issues an “overpayment” demand (typically prompted by my ex-wife). DWP subsequently audits, confirms I was not liable (since my arrest/removal on 19/03/2009 and re-application on 22/03/2009), and refunds the sum. This persistent harassment through child tax credits is aligned with her broader malicious narrative: She refuses to repay what she owes and insists I should bear it. She weaponises that narrative in parallel with false allegations (rape, abuse, harassment) that were defeated in family proceedings in 2013 and discredited medically in 2006.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: HMRC 20_08_2025.pdf Probative: Child Tax Credit Refunded by DWP 29_08_2025.pdf Appendix F	Chronology: 06/12/2021 HMRC Demand (Tax Credit Overpayment £69.76) Chronology: 22/07/2021 Ex-Wife Spiteful Report Chronology: 02/08/2012 Malicious Website Referrals Chronology: 20/03/2009 Marital Breakup Recriminations Chronology: 04/11/2005 High-Gravity Safeguarding Record

Note: Police engagement shows “bleed back” from ASB Officer Sharples’ smear, which she seized upon to rekindle allegations already disproven. The key point: her financial spite and her malicious allegations are one continuum. The HMRC/DWP paper trail is not about institutional error but about her persistence in deceit. It undercuts the credibility of every complaint she has lodged — including those that fed into the committal proceedings that led to my imprisonment.

26/06/2025: PHSO Casework flagged for referral Public Health Services Ombudsman officer response to referall aplogises for any delay and inidcates the matter has been assigned to case worker team "CT8".
- Oversight: PHSO Caseworker flagged.pdf
06/09/2025: Re-discovery of Singh Report During the Victim's second review of the extensive archive (2,000+ files across 190 folders) of case materials prompted by the EEAS Disclosure, it becomes clear that the case file supplied by Satchell Moran to Higgs Newton Keyon contained the tainted Singh psychiatric report (16/11/2022) and related corrupted records. This discovery evidences that HNK’s advice and ongoing processes were premised on inherited, poisoned files.
- Probative:Singh Report (16/11/2022)
- Probative:Satchell Moran Termination (02/06/2023)
- Probative:HNK Receipt Confirmation (03/02/2025)
- Note Demonstrates chain of contamination — Singh → Satchell Moran → HNK. Establishes continuing prejudice from corrupted expert opinion being carried forward into new representation.
12/09/2025: Discovery — 13/10/2022 Judgment v. Email Audit HHJ Pigram’s committal judgment of 13/10/2022 rested on an assertion of 25 offending emails. Personal audit of the Victim’s email account confirms only nine emails were sent in the cited period, none of which breached any injunction or restraining order. Several directly challenged the underlying civil fraud. The discrepancy between judgment and audit renders the committal unsafe, amounting to a misrepresentation of material facts. Under CPR 81 (criminal standard for contempt) and the common law maxim fraus omnia corrumpit (Lazarus Estates v Beasley [1956] 1 QB 702), the judgment is voidable/void. This discovery also reinforces the pattern of vexatious committal proceedings by ASB Officer Sharples (cf. failed 2021 attempt), supporting causes of action in misfeasance in public office and malicious prosecution.
- Probative: HHJ Pigram - Committal to Prison.pdf
- Probative:26-07-2022.pdf ~ Three Different Narratives
- Chronology: 13/10/2022: Judgement In Absence
25/09/2025: PSD Norfolk – Response to PSD
- 25/09/2025: PSD Norfolk – Admission of Administrative Failure PSD Norfolk acknowledged that the IOPC-forwarded referral of 11/07/2025 had not been actioned due to an internal administrative error. The department confirmed no progress had been made on the complaint and requested basic clarification before any enquiry could begin.
- Oversight:PSD Norfolk late response 25-09-2025.pdf
- 25/09/2025: Response to PSD – Clarification of Falsified Log (17/07/2018): The Victim replied to PSD Norfolk’s delayed enquiry, confirming the “log” was the CAD/incident entry created on 18/08/2018 and not a crime report. He clarified there was no crime reference number because the event was wrongly recorded as “criminal damage” despite no such damage occurring on that date and his vehicle being SORN and covered. He confirmed supporting documentation derived from police disclosure and EEAS records (01/07/2025) proving paramedic attendance for an assault on 17/07/2018. He stated a SAR was unnecessary as the evidence was already compiled in his Litigation Support Bundle. The Victim reiterated the assault had been reported at the time and that the constabulary later mischaracterised it. He requested correction of the falsified entry, an explanation of the error, and proper handling under the Police Reform Act.
- Oversight: Response to Norfolk PSD Ref MI-743-25.pdf
29/09/2025: Instructions to HNK – Foundational Error in 13/10/2022 Committal The Victim wrote to HNK (Lowri Phillips; cc [email protected], Hannah McGarvey) outlining the core legal errors underlying the 13/10/2022 committal. The email detailed that the committal resulted from LiP correspondence challenging civil fraud, that the judgment was void due to factual misrepresentation, and that the resulting 7.5-month incarceration constituted a breach of HRA Article 5 anchored in misfeasance. The Victim supplied the fraud-continuum causal chains and reiterated that the committal cannot be separated from the civil-fraud foundation.
- Probative: Instructions - Legal Counsel 29-09-2025.pdf
06/10/2025: Mandate to HNK – Urgent Action Required on Void Judgment The Victim confirmed ongoing instruction to HNK regarding civil claims and issued a mandate requiring immediate action to purge the taint of fraud affecting those claims. The email required HNK to confirm the filing date for an urgent application to set aside the committal and injunction on grounds of fraud on the court, with a deadline for confirmation by 10/10/2025.
- Probative: Mandate to HNK 06-10-2025.pdf
07/10/2025: HNK Reassert Non-Instruction – Notice of Failed Mandate Issued
- 07/10/2025: HNK Reassert Non-Instruction: HNK (via Lowri Phillips) confirmed the firm is not instructed in respect of fraud, reiterating prior refusals and declining to engage with the underlying civil-fraud issues.
- Probative: Lowri Phillips HNK Not Instructed 07-10-2025.pdf
- 08/10/2025: Notice of Failed Mandate – Suspension of HNK’s Authority: The Victim issued formal notice suspending HNK’s authority after the firm refused to act on the urgent application to set aside the committal and injunction. The notice stated that no further substantive action was authorised pending the outcomes of PHSO, PSD/IOPC, and LeO referrals, and that the firm’s refusal would be provided to regulators as evidence of non-performance of a professional mandate.
- Probative: Notice of Failed Mandate – Suspension of Authority 07-10-2025.pdf
09/10/2025: HNK Termination of CFAs Following Suspension Notice HNK issued formal notice terminating all CFA agreements and closing the files, citing the Victim’s 07/10/2025 suspension of their authority. The firm stated they would only consider re-opening the matters after all oversight complaints were concluded and a full review of prospects was completed.
- Probative: HNK 09_10_2025 Terminating CFA.pdf

14/10/2025: Mandatory Reconsideration Submitted (DWP PIP) A Mandatory Reconsideration request, clearly marked and supported by extensive medical and legal documentation evidencing vulnerability and prior authoritative violence, was submitted to DWP PIP and later confirmed as received the following day.

Documents	Chronology
Probative: DWP PIP Documentation (Shell)	Chronology: 15/01/2026 Non-processing of a Live Statutory Request

16/10/2025: PHSO Issues Proposed Scope of Investigation
- 16/10/2025: PHSO Issues Proposed Scope of Investigation
- PHSO caseworker Aqeel Yaqoob issued the first formal “proposed scope” document for the complaint against NSFT. He outlined four claimed failings: the false sectioning on 28/05/2021, failure to explain the sectioning, unauthorised attendance of an ASB officer at a medical meeting on 22/04/2021, and failure to review the claimant’s medical history. He requested confirmation of the scope and further detail regarding highlighted items.
- Oversight: AY-251016-140503 PHSO - C-2154042 16-10-2025.pdf
- 16/10/2025: Claimant Confirms Scope and Establishes Jurisdiction
- PHSO caseworker Aqeel Yaqoob issued the first formal “proposed scope” document for the complaint against NSFT. He outlined four claimed failings: the false sectioning on 28/05/2021, failure to explain the sectioning, unauthorised attendance of an ASB officer at a medical meeting on 22/04/2021, and failure to review the claimant’s medical history. He requested confirmation of the scope and further detail regarding highlighted items.
- Oversight: MB-251016-142510 PHSO - C-2154042 16-10-2025.pdf

18/10/2025: Claimant Challenges PHSO’s Proposed Scope With Factual Corrections The Claimant issued a detailed factual rebuttal to PHSO caseworker Aqeel Yaqoob’s proposed scope. The response clarified the full circumstances of the 27/09/2020 arrest, confirmed the acquittal on 05/01/2021, and outlined procedural inconsistencies in the 22/04/2021 Professionals’ Meeting. The Claimant highlighted contradictions between the meeting minutes and the established evidential record, including references to weapons, drugs, and alleged online activity already disproven. He requested confirmation that the Professionals’ Meeting minutes and corrected chronology would be reviewed in light of these facts.

Documents	Chronology
Oversight: MB-251017-003719 PHSO - C-2154042 17-10-2025.pdf	Chronology: 22/04/2021 Unconsented Professionals Meeting

11/11/2025: PHSO Caseworker Challenges Jurisdiction

11/11/2025: ⬬ PHSO Caseworker Challenges Jurisdiction
Caseworker Aqeel Yaqoob issued a further time-limit challenge, asserting the complaint should have reached PHSO by May/June 2022 based on the Trust-stage activity in late 2021. He acknowledged he is the assigned investigator but maintained the position that the March 2025 submission was nearly three years out of time. He requested additional justification beyond the homelessness period for the late escalation.
Oversight: AY-251111-144522 PHSO - C-2154042 11-11-2025.pdf

11/11/2025: Claimant Rebuts PHSO Time-Limit Challenge (With Evidence of Continuing Maladministration) (C-2154042)
The Claimant issued a detailed response to PHSO caseworker Aqeel Yaqoob, rejecting the assertion that the complaint was nearly three years out of time. He explained that the delay resulted from destabilisation caused by NSFT’s actions and subsequent loss of representation and housing. The Claimant outlined three developments demonstrating ongoing maladministration: (1) Dr J Singh’s November 2022 medico-legal report confirming persistent contamination of the NSFT clinical record; (2) EEAS disclosure (July 2025) evidencing systemic falsification underpinning the 2020–22 proceedings; and (3) PSD Norfolk findings (MI/743/25) showing the same corrupted material remains active in police systems. These continuing defects were cited as grounds for timeliness under paragraph 9(3) of the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967.

Documents	Chronology
Oversight: MB-251111-153123 PHSO - C-2154042 11-11-2025.pdf	Chronology: 30/06/2025 ✱ Seed Event: EEAS Disclosures Chronology: 16/11/2022 ◈ Tri-domain Crossover: Dr. Singh Report (Recycled Contaminated Records) Chronology: 22/04/2021 ◈ Tri-domain Crossover: Professionals Meeting

24/11/2025: ⬬ PSD Norfolk Response Indicates Scope Evasion Despite the Victim supplying documentary evidence (CAD, PCR, audio files, and structured synthesis of cross-agency contamination), PSD Norfolk continued to classify the matter as a “Right to Rectification” issue. This position disregarded: the multi-year use of contaminated intelligence originating from the 2018 falsified log, documented cross-agency propagation, reliance on disproven assumptions in 2021–2022 operational decisions, and the continued appearance of the same contaminated narrative within PSD’s own correspondence. PSD Norfolk did not address the misconduct elements raised, including:

Documents

Chronology

Unlawful disclosure of policing information to a private ASB officer.
Failure to record the 17/07/2018 assault despite CAD/PCR evidence.
Use of corrupted intelligence in subsequent policing decisions.
Influence of the same material on civil and clinical processes (2020–2022).
Oversight:24-11-2025-psd-norfolk-responses.pdf
Oversight:24--11-2025-psd-norfolk-additional.pdf

Chronology: 01/07/2025 EEAS Disclosure (Independent Validation)
Chronology: 18/10/2022 Arrest and Imprisonment
Chronology: 18/02/2021 Finding of Fact (Court Relied on Fraud)
Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest
Chronology: 13/08/2018 Seed Falsification (EEAS Proves)
Chronology: 17/07/2018 Assault (Origin of False Record)
Chronology: 23/09/2017 Compromising Encounter (Campaign Origin)

Note: A synthesis document (Executive Synthesis) outlining the full contamination chain (2017–2025) was submitted directly within the email body under PSD reference MI/743/25. Awaiting PSD’s formal response.

25/11/2025: Continuum Reconstruction Suite Published in response to oversight friction, this suite was originally developed as an OFFLINE Deterministic Continuum Forensic Reconstruction tool to help an index of the probative corpus of documentation produced by the 'system' and actors, it now functions as a 'safe corner' to stand in while everybody else decides who is going to 'carry the bag' first. If you are viewing this suite online some links do not 'work' due to server/browser online security policies that restrict cross-directory folder view navigation. This online denied functionality is required in a legal 'framework' hence the strict offline requirements of this suite during and throughout development. Offline does not imply online dysfunction merely online restriction for general security policy reasons.

Documents	Chronology
PUBLIC DOMAIN: Systemic Reconstruction Platform	Chronology: 28/07/2025 Public Domain Recovery Chronology: 08/08/2022 Domain Blocked Alleged Fraud Chronology: 02/08/2012 Malicious Website Referrals

26/11/2025: Legal Ombudsman Notifation Victim receives notification from Legal Ombudsman (LeO) of formal engagement with matters arising from Higgs Newton Kenyon referral to LeO relating to service failures.
- Oversight: LeO-full-engagement-26-11-2025.pdf

05/12/2025: ⬬ PSD Norfolk responds to clarification with repeated misdirection to rectification Victim refers the matter back to IOPC: Ref - 2025009880: Escalation Request – PSD Norfolk Mishandling of Misconduct Complaint (Ref: MI/743/25)

Documents	Chronology
Oversight: PSD Norfolk 05-12-2025.pdf Oversight: escalation-request-to-IOPC-05-12-2025	Chronology: 06/04/2022 IOPC Initial Referrals Chronology: 14/01/2021 False Paedophile Allegations Chronology: 05/01/2021 Charges Dismissed Chronology: 23/12/2020 CPS No Emails Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report

Matrix: C-19

22/12/2025: ⬬ Victim receives notification from IOPC stating in their initial response to an escalation request that PSD Norfolk are still investigating, this is contrary to PSD communications received by the victim from PSD Norfolk. Victim responds advising IOPC: "Your response appears to proceed on the assumption that my police conduct complaint is “ongoing with PSD” and therefore there are currently no review rights. That assumption is not consistent with PSD’s written correspondence."
- Oversight: IOPC Response to Escalation Referral-22-12-2025.pdf
- Oversight: Victim Reply to IOPC-22-12-2025.pdf
- Matrix: C-19
29/12/2025: Sussex Constabulary FOI Request Victim makes a disclosure request regarding the assault in March 2025 and the traffic stop in April 2025.
- Oversight: 29-12-2025-foi-request-68442-25-4700-01.pdf
2026

08/01/2026: PHSO Caseworker Telephone Contact and Referral to Published Evidential Platform Following a telephone call from the PHSO caseworker indicating that further questions would be raised, the Victim responded in writing on the same date. The written response confirmed that the full evidential record relating to the complaint, including contemporaneous NHS records, had been placed in the public domain in a structured and inspectable format. The Victim stated that the questions raised were addressed directly within the published platform and indicated that no parallel narrative explanation would be provided outside the published record, in order to avoid mischaracterisation or selective interpretation. The caseworker was referred to the publicly accessible platform for review. Telephone Statement (Paraphrased for Record): During the telephone call, the Victim stated that the matter concerned issues of public interest and that the complete evidential platform — including NHS and oversight-related records — had been published online in a structured format and made publicly accessible.

Documents	Chronology
Oversight: 08-01-2026-PHSO-C-20154042-telephone-call-response.pdf	Chronology: 11/11/2025: Caseworker Challenges Aspects of Referral

Note: No further contact was received following referral of the caseworker to the published evidential record and notification that no parallel narrative explanation would be provided outside that record.

09/01/2026: ICO Regulatory Deferral (Data Protection Complaint) The Information Commissioner’s Office acknowledged receipt and review of the complaint concerning Flagship Housing Group Ltd (Case Ref: IC-391891-P5B4). The ICO recorded the complaint for systemic monitoring purposes but declined to take individual enforcement action at this time, expressly routing any personal redress or corrective action to courts or other regulatory/oversight bodies. No finding of compliance was made; the victim responds to ICO indicating the public interest nature of the matter dictates public exposure of the matter and advises current publication of this platform.
- Oversight: 09-01-2026-ICO-Case-Ref-IC-391891-P5B4.pdf
- Oversight: 09-01-2026-ICO-Case-Ref-IC-391891-P5B4-victim-response.pdf

14/01/2026: Regulatory Deadlock Acknowledged and Escalated; External Notice Given The Independent Office for Police Conduct issued a further response reiterating that responsibility lay with Norfolk Constabulary Professional Standards Department (PSD) and directing the victim back to PSD, despite having been informed that PSD had rejected the IOPC’s referral and were not investigating.
The correspondence proceeded on the false premise that a PSD investigation was ongoing and failed to address the refusal of the IOPC’s own referral. The IOPC (Ref 2025/009880) were placed on notice PSD Norfolk had rejected IOPC referral, and demonstrably failed to follow IOPC mandated investigation. IOPC disclaims power to intervene directing the complainant back to police PSD despite being informed the referral had been refused.

Documents	Chronology
Oversight: 14-01-2026-IOPC-2025-009880-refusal.pdf Home Office: 14-01-2026-home-office-response.pdf Public: 14-01-2026-the-bureau-investigates.com.pdf	Chronology: 20/08/2025 Public Domain Recovery Chronology: 08/08/2022 Public Domain Suspension (Alleged Fraud) Chronology: 02/08/2012 Malicious Website Referrals and Domain Disruption Chronology: 29/09/2004 First Publications - Self Hosted/Public Domain

Note: Central government was notified and acknowledged receipt contemporaneously with public exposure. Later the same day, an external notice-of-existence email was sent to an investigative body informing them of a publicly available forensic archive documenting cross-institutional failure resulting in deprivation of liberty.

19/01/2026: Creation of initial chronology markup template A static HTML chronology markup template was created, consisting solely of rendered chronology entry examples intended for manual copy-paste use. This template provided two rendered styles of chronology entry as plain markup only. The purpose was to stabilise semantic structure and visual form prior to any tooling or platform development and/or design toward a replicable method.
23/01/2026: Publication of Executable Creator Documents Executable creator documents enabling the offline generation of court-safe artefacts were published to the public domain. These documents are adjunct to, but independent of, the evidential platform and emit finished artefacts structurally identical to reference outputs. Publication records the transition from a case-specific artefact to a reproducible execution capability.
Documents Chronology
Public: Forensic Platform Generators
- Note: Publication of an adjacent class of executable creator documents which externalise method as execution, materially extending the implications of the platform from instance to replicable capability.
27/01/2026: Chronology Generator Achieves Functional Authoring State The executable creator document, chronology-generator-v1.5.6.html reached a stage of stable functional operation, supporting durable collection state, edit and delete operations, layout refactoring, and correct rehydration of rendered and markup views across sessions. This milestone marks the transition from prototype execution to a usable authoring instrument capable of producing consistent, court-safe chronology artefacts without loss of structural fidelity.
Documents Chronology
Public: chronology-generator-v1.5.6.html

Public: Forensic Platform Generators
- Note: This development confirms the practical viability of the executable creator documents as authoring tools rather than demonstrative artefacts, materially reducing dependence on manual reconstruction and enabling sustained use across iterative compilation cycles.

02/02/2026: IOPC response following escalation to Home Office Police Integrity Unit In this correspondence, the IOPC no longer asserted that an investigation was ongoing. Instead, the IOPC stated that they had contacted the relevant Police Standards Department (PSD) to “clarify the status” of the matter and awaited an update. This represents a change in position from earlier correspondence, which proceeded on the stated premise that an investigation was active, despite prior notification that the referral had been refused by PSD.

Documents	Chronology
Oversight: 02-02-2026-IOPC-Response-re-Escalation-to-Police-Integrity-Unit_-_Home Office	Chronology: 14/01/2026 Regulatory Deadlock Acknowledged and Escalated

Note: No explanation was provided for the earlier reliance on that premise, and no account was given of the regulatory position in circumstances where a force refuses an IOPC referral.

05/02/2026: ⤤ PSD response to IOPC re-referral (MI/743/25) Professional Standards acknowledged repeated IOPC contact but restated earlier positions by treating the matters as unlocated 2018 incidents or already-closed 2022 complaints, redirecting the complainant to non-complaints processes and requesting a reformulated submission of “outstanding” issues before any further assessment. Across repeated cycles following IOPC referral (2022–2025), PSD has not commenced investigation

Documents	Chronology
Oversight: 05-02-2026-psd-repeated-rejection-IOPC-referral.pdf	Chronology: ⤤ 05/12/2025 Chronology: 06/04/2022 IOPC Initial Referrals Chronology: 14/01/2021 False Paedophile Allegations Chronology: 05/01/2021 Charges Dismissed Chronology: 23/12/2020 CPS No Emails Chronology: 27/09/2020 Unlawful Arrest Chronology: 25/08/2020 ASB Officer Crime Report

Note: Despite IOPC re-referral, PSD continues to rely on the same initial categorisation of the issues, with no evidence of reassessment. This preserves the original misclassification as the controlling premise, through which subsequent requests for clarification are routed, returning the process to evidential intake rather than regulatory investigation.

09/02/2026: Home Office routing response The Home Office acknowledged receipt of correspondence forwarded internally from the Police Integrity Unit and advised that the matter had been returned to PIU for handling, noting no direct submission had been made to the Home Office.
Documents Chronology
Home Office: TRO/1449899/26

“A generation which ignores history has no past — and no future.” — Robert A. Heinlein

2004

2005

2006

2007

2009

2012

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026